Peralta Community College District Sealed Solicitation
Title: Laney College Library & Learning Resource Center
Deadline: 1/31/2025 2:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Status: In Review
Solicitation Number: 24 25 01
Description: The project consists of construction of a new three story 75,622 sq. ft. building at 900 Fallon Street, Oakland, CA 94607. Project estimated at $80million.
Pre-Bid Meeting Date: 10/8/2024 11:00 AM
Pre-Bid Meeting Details: Mandatory attendance by the bidding General Contractor is required at one of the three meetings in order to submit a bid. No site visit will take place. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. 1. Pre- Bid Meeting #1 will be held on October 8, 2024 at 11:00 A.M. To register in advance for this meeting: https://peralta-edu.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcofuuorzosG928-NcChVsU4KHp_hLfQ1tT Meeting ID: 835 9201 1619 2. Pre-Bid Meeting #2 will be held on October 24, 2024 at 1:00 P.M. To register in advance for this meeting: https://peralta-edu.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZwtceGvrTkvE9PwlJBexlqxTS9K-3BtaFTa Meeting ID: 880 6873 2597 3. Pre-Bid Meeting #3 will be held on October 29, 2024 at 11:00 A.M. To register in advance for this meeting: https://peralta-edu.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0tfuGurTIoE9YRbH3nSG90KvTMem6UDuYz Meeting ID: 890 9863 9292
Documents:
Addition 1
Posted: 11/22/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum One
Overview: Addendum One. Project schedule updates, responses to RFI, existing document clarifications.
Documents:
Addition 2
Posted: 12/20/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum Two
Overview: Bid opening video meeting invitation, responses to RFI, etc.
Documents:
Addition 3
Posted: 1/10/2025
Type of Addition: Addendum Three
Overview: Addendum Three contains project schedule changes, etc.
Documents:
Addition 4
Posted: 1/18/2025
Type of Addition: Addendum Four
Overview: Responses to questions, changes to and addition of contract documents.
Documents:
Addition 6
Posted: 2/4/2025
Type of Addition: Designated subcontractors list for all three bids
Overview:
Documents:
Question 1
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: There is a Q&A provided with the re-bid documents 1) please confirm that answers provided in the orig. bid's Q&A are to be incorporated into the bid on 12/12, 2) The Q&A references, “See Addendum…” in several areas as well as indicates new plan sheets and specification sections that were issued during the prior bid. Please confirm that these plan sheets and spec sections have been included in the new bid set issued for this project. 2) if not, please provide them as well as the addenda from the previous bid.
Response: If referring to Appendix G- Bid 23 24 03 Bidder Questions & District Responses, then yes/ confirmed. See blocked note on Sheet 1 shown in red text: Appendix G- Bid 23 24 03 Bidder Questions & District Responses NOTE TO BIDDERS REGARDING BID 24 25/01: Responses to these bidder questions have been incorporated into the Re-Issue to Bid documents dated August 9, 2024
Question 2
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: Section 313213 - DMM GROUND IMPROVEMENT. Table A.1: Minimum DMM Ar and Maximum DMM Grid Spacing requires Minimum Ar = 50% at Specified Unconfined Compression Strength = 125 PSI for Option1. 3.15 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, Paragraph 2 states: “Two alternative specified unconfined compressive strengths are provided with corresponding minimum Ar and maximum grid spacing in Table A.1. The DMM Contractor shall select one of these options for the entire project.” Please provide the second alternative.
Response: Values provided in Table A.1 are not be reduced. Item 3.15 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, Paragraph 2 is to be deleted as only one (1) value is provided in Table A.1.
Question 3
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: Is it possible to reduce the Unconfined Compression Strength from 125 psi @ Minimum Ar = 50% to 95 psi @ Minimum Ar = 66%?
Response: Unconfined Compression Strength is not to be reduced.
Question 4
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: Is the Alameda County SLEB consider a SLBE under this contract?
Response: SLBE certification with Alameda County will count as SLBE with PCCD as long as the firm is located within the six PCCD cities (Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland, Piedmont) and are within the PCCD revenue thresholds (Construction services - $11.5M or less; Goods and Non-professional services - $6.5M or less; Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services - $5M or less).
Question 5
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: “Please clarify if SLBE and SELBE subcontractors listed need to serve a commercially useful function as described in 00 45 46.13-1: Commercially Useful Function: Shall mean a business is directly responsible for providing the materials, equipment, supplies or services to the District as required by the contract solicitation. The business performs work that is normal for its business services and carries out its obligation by actually performing, managing, or supervising the work involved. The business is not Commercially Useful if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of SLBE or SELBE participation. This would mean that GCs cannot list a SLBE or SELBE subcontractor that has a General A and/or B license and have the general subcontractor carry enough non-SLBE/SELBE sub-tier trades to meet the 25% mandatory SLBE/SELBE goal. This format will be considered a pass-through arrangement, resulting in the bidding GC being deemed non-responsive.”
Response: Yes, please refer to the updated Small, Local Business Enterprise (SLBE) Board Policy for more information. Below is the link to the SLBE Program: https://build.peralta.edu/small-local-business-program.
Question 6
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: The Construction General Permit 2009-0009-DWQ is out of date. This is listed under Document 01 57 00 of the General Requirements. The current CGP Order number is 2022-0057-DWQ. Would you consider changing it?
Response: Note revision to Document 01 57 00, SWPPP, Item 1.2.A. "During the construction period, the Contractor is responsible for insuring compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act of 1987, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) No. CA S000002, the State Water Resources Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Construction General Permit (CGP) Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ(old number) 2022-0057 DWQ(new number), and subsequent implementation of these laws and orders by local and regional jurisdictions."" WILL BE NOTED IN FUTURE ADDENDUM 01."
Question 7
Posted: 10/9/2024
Question: Can you please post the attendance list from the 1st mandatory Zoom meeting that was held on October 8th?
Response: The sign in sheet to the October 8th meeting has now been posted. It is Appendix J under project Documents.
Question 8
Posted: 10/9/2024
Question: GC's will need to attend two of three SLBE networking meetings. Please clarify when and where these meetings will be held.
Response: See Appendix H- Laney L&LRC SLBE Outreach Flyer for dates, times and locations.
Question 9
Posted: 10/29/2024
Question: SECTION 250000 Could you please submit the following RFIs? - Could you please confirm that BAS contractor should furnish all the Valves, Actuators, AFMS, BTU and Flow Meters for installation by others? o Please confirm the Air Monitor, model OAM II-2322-1BMMM is preferred model number for AFMS. o Please confirm the Turbine Meter (Recordall) 6” & 3 “ are preferred Flow Meters. o Confirm BAS contractor is responsible for all conduits and chases to all peripherals. - Could you please confirm that the BAS contractor should provide the required 120V circuit for each TCP? o Confirm BAS contractor is responsible for all conduits and chases to all peripherals. - Please confirm the controller can be installed within 20 feet of the corresponding ceiling fan. - For lighting control and power monitoring please confirm DIV.26 contractor is furnishing and installing IP drop(s). - Please confirm that Mechanical Contractor furnishes and installs line voltage thermostat for Transfer Fans and wired by Div. 26. - Please verify BAS contractor carries the required point licensing for Delta Control BMS. - Are VAV boxes provided with factory-installed controllers? - Please confirm conduits are required in open spaces for low voltage and BACnet communication wiring. - Please confirm whether this project requires buying America Certification or not.
Response: (1) Refer to coordination table in Section 230501. Sensor wells, meters and other pipe-mounted control devices are supplied by Division 25, installed by Division 23, and wired by Division 25. Valve actuators are installed by Division 25 if not supplied with the valve. (2) OAM II is the preferred AFMS. Provide manufacturer recommended number of uni-sensors—each uni-senor can cover up to 30 ft2. (3) See Section 250000 2.0L.1 for FM-1 type flow meter and 2.9L.6 from FM-6 type flow meter requirements. FM-6 meters are used for domestic water consumption and domestic hot water consumption. FM-1 meters are used as part of BTU-1 for CHW and HHW BTUH measurement. (4) See Section 250000 3.9A. Division 25 contractor is responsible for all wiring, wiring connections, and raceways unless specifically indicated in Division 26 drawings otherwise. Division 25 is responsible for control and signal wiring and appropriate raceways, as well. See Section 250000 3.10A and 3.10B. (5) "TCPs noted on mechanical drawings have 120V power provided by Division 26. See Division 26 Electrical Drawings for power locations pre-allocated for BAS system. See Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Remark 10." (6) See response to Question 9.04, above. Appears to be a duplicate. (7) Intent is to locate fan controls near lighting and shade controls for each space. Some fans may be further than 20 feet from their corresponding controllers. Provide fan control wiring per 12/BAS0.0.1 in lengths as required from fans to controllers. (8) Connection from BAS to gateways provided by Division 25 per Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row E.1 (lighting control gateway) and Remark 12 (power monitoring gateway). (9) Per Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row D.3, Division 25 contractor supplies line voltage thermostats, and Division 26 installs and wires them. (10) Correct. See Section 250000 2.11B. (11) No. See Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row K.3. VAV controllers provided by Division 25. (12) All low voltage and communication wiring shall be installed in UL Listed approved raceway where exposed to occupant view per Section 250000 3.10A.3.b.1)c). (13) There are no Buy American Certification requirements for this project.
Question 10
Posted: 10/31/2024
Question: Looking at the SLBE outreach flyer, it says there is a 25% requirement for SLBE. Looking at section 00 4546 it states if you get 25% you get a bid discount and that there is a 25% annual program goal but I do not see that it is a requirement. Are we missing something? Is it a requirement or a goal where you get a bid discount?
Response: According to the approved Peralta Community College District Board Policy 6355, there is a 25% SLBE requirement for this project. This is a requirement set forth by the District. By exceeding the 25% SLBE requirement, firms can earn three- to five-percent bidding preference.
Question 11
Posted: 10/31/2024
Question: If we were to JV the project with an SLBE contractor, I am not seeing how JV Participation is accounted for in section 00 4546. Can you please advise?
Response: See SLBE participation values are published in Document 00 45 46.13-Addendum 1.
Question 12
Posted: 11/13/2024
Question: Please help to remove the confusion on the part of general contractors and subcontractors as to whether they need to prequalify in order to bid on this project. If there is a prequalification required - please provide the specific instructions on how and where to prequalify since we have heard that we can no longer prequalify on Quality Bidders. It would be appreciated if you provided the prequalification information, as well as the new bid date of 1/16/25, in an addendum. Thank you!
Response: The Peralta Community College District has discontinued the use of Quality Bidders with Colbi Technologies. Currently, bidder qualifications will be assessed upon the submission of a bid for a district project. Any updates to the district's process will be communicated to our bidder and vendor communities.
Question 13
Posted: 11/19/2024
Question: Will Laney College approve Library Bureau Steel as an acceptable manufacturer for Section 11 51 23 (Library Stack Systems)? LBS meets all the specifications under 115123. Library Bureau Steel is the oldest library shelving manufacturer in the USA, started in 1876 by Melvil Dewey, the creator of the Dewey Decimal System.
Response: All substitutions are to follow requirements outlined in Document 01 25 13, Product Options and Substitutions and Document 01 25 16, Substitution Request Procedures. Complete and submit the “Substitution Request Form” in Document 01 25 16 for consideration. If acceptable, it will be noted in a forthcoming Addenda. Submit as a separate Bidder Question.
Question 14
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Reference 004546.13. 1) For clarity please confirm that the first sentence can/should read: a. “The District is committed to ensure equal opportunity and equitable treatment in awarding and managing its public contracts and has established an annual overall program goal of twenty-five percent (25%) participation for business with SLBE and SELBE certificates of Alameda County.” OR b. “The District is committed to ensure equal opportunity and equitable treatment in awarding and managing its public contracts and has established an annual overall program goal of twenty-five percent (25%) participation for business with SLBE and SELBE certificates in the specified cities of XYZ.” c. Note: stating “25% for small local businesses” is too vague and does not have any mention of the geographic requirements. 2) In the definitions section, SLBE and SELBE appear to be project-specific definitions. There are Federal, State, County, and even city-specific SLBE and SELBE certificates that have different annual revenue limits. For example, the Federal the limit for SLBE is $19M to 45M depending if it’s a subcontractor or general contractor. a. I would kindly suggest and request that only the project-eligible entities for providing recognized SLBE and SELBE certificates be listed and, it be mentioned if these are project-specific limits rather than limits defined by the entity who provides the certification. 3) It has been the understanding that this project is looking for SLBE and SELBE subs who have this certification from Alameda County. As can be found on their website: https://sleb.acgov.org/#/find-a-supplier/ a. This specification is significantly limiting to the geographic location requirements of ONLY “Albany, Alameda, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland, or Piedmont” it does not include major locations such as Hayward, Fremont, or San Leandro. Clarify if this is the intent.
Response: 1) Geographic Location Requirements are noted on page 2 of Document 00 45 46.13. 2) See Item ADD-1.003; Bidder Question 4. 3)The District's market area does not include all of Alameda County. Geographic Location Requirements are noted on page 2 of Document 00 45 46.13
Question 15
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: 034819 - Precast Concrete Stair Treads is a provided spec but not listed in the table of contents 00 01 10. Please confirm this spec is applicable to the project
Response: AMENDED: Specification Section 03 48 19 Precast Concrete Stair Treads is to be removed from the Project Manual. See Specification Section 09 66 23, Precast Epoxy Terrazzo for the Stair C, stair tread scope. A revised Document 00 01 10, Table of Contents will be amended to reflect this change and issued in Addendum 2.
Question 16
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: 311316 - Site Concrete spec has conflicting titles. Appears it should be 321316
Response: The correct Specification Section is 321316, Site Concrete. The specification number on page 1 of the section will be corrected and issued as part of Addendum 2.
Question 17
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Please advise where is the exterior curtain wall schedule. There appears only to be an interior glazing system schedule. Please provide one if it does not exist.
Response: Exterior curtain wall dimensions and quantities are located on the exterior elevations, Sheets A3.11-A3.14. Basis of design for CW types are designated on the elevations and described in the Specification Section 08 44 13, Item 2.4.
Question 18
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Please let us know the time and date of the RFI deadline. Thank you!
Response: See Appendix M, Updated Bid Schedule
Question 19
Posted: 11/22/2024
Question: Reference A8.51, A8.52, A8.53. There are two different Storefront systems in the same elevation, they have detailed Center Set & Front Set Storefront systems and they cant be used together because the Plane of glass are in different location. We need to know which elevations are Front Set and what are Center Cet.
Response: A column for "Orientation" was added to Sheet A8.51, Interior Storefront Schedule to designate Front or Center set. New Detail 30/A8.53 GS5 - Vertical Transition @ Front/Back added and called out in SF6 on A8.51. Sill details updated to 10/A8.53 in SF36, SF37, SF44 & SF45 on A8.52. This update will be included as part of Addendum 2.
Question 20
Posted: 11/26/2024
Question: Please publish the compete Revit model for the building.
Response: The Revit model will be provided to the awarded bidder after receipt of their signature release for electronic files. The Revit model will not be available to bidders prior to bid opening.
Question 21
Posted: 11/27/2024
Question: 00 01 00 Table of Contents lists 00 41 00 Bid Proposal as being included with the project manual; however, it is missing. Please provide 00 41 00.
Response: There is no Document 00 41 00, Bid Proposal listed on Document 00 01 00, Table of Contents dated August 9, 2024 for the Laney College Library and Learning Resource Center Project (Bid No. 24 25/01). Document 00 41 13, Bid Proposal and Form is explicitly identified. Use Document 00 41 13, Bid Proposal and Form as noted, provided and included with your respective bid submission.
Question 22
Posted: 12/19/2024
Question: Please confirm if it's acceptable to use TRD (Trench cutting Re-mixing Deep wall) soil mixing techniques to install the DMM Ground Improvements.
Response: Bidder/ Contractor to follow recommendations of the geotechnical report and the project specifications for deep mixing method (DMM). Trench cutting and remixing deep soil mix walls (TRD) uses different equipment and would require an additional DSA review.
Question 23
Posted: 12/30/2024
Question: 1. Please provide locations for 4 bike racks per specs 2.2.b section 32 30 00. 2. Please provide irrigation mainline size, electrical conduit, and sleeve size at North of Laney Library & Learning Resource Center on sheet L7.01 3. Refer to L1.01, symbol of rock mulch shows at Northeast of Laney Library & Learning Resource Center. However, on sheet L5.01, it is not showed. Please clarify.
Response: 1) Provide 4 bike racks per spec, location to be coordinated with the District at a later date. Assume a 14" deep x 18" x 31.5" concrete footing for each rack. 2) For bidding purposes, Contractor to assume 4” mainline, based on historic as-builts. This is to be verified in field per notes on Sheet L7.01 to match existing. Electrical conduit and sleeve size criteria are provided in Specification Section 32 84 00. 3) Correct, locations for rock mulch documented on Sheet L1.01. See Sheet L0.01 for clarification for mulch type in Planting Legend.
Question 24
Posted: 12/30/2024
Question: Section 00 7313 item 11 - 10.1.1.2.3.4 requires a value of not less than 10% for close-out documentation on the SOV. For an $80M project that is $8M! With 5% or $4M already being held for retention and then wanting another $8M to be held for a $50K item until the end of the job, that is really just a 15% retention and puts a huge burden on a contractor and being underbilled on a project throughout. This will force us to include a large sum of money to our bid for financing the project based on this requirement. Money that the district could use toward actual work product and helping keep the budget of the project intact. We ask that this provision be removed or at least reduced to something more reasonable like $50K or $100K?
Response: Delete Item 11, Preliminary Schedule of Values within Document 00 73 13, Special Conditions. Refer to Section 10.1, Schedule of Work, Schedule of Submittals and Schedule of Values in Document 00 72 13, General Conditions. An amended Document 00 73 13, Special Conditions, will be issued to reflect this change with the next Addendum issuance.
Question 25
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: The bid form has an alternate noted, however, Addendum #2 has a revised Sheet G0.00 that instructs us to remove reference to the alternate. Is this correct? If correct, is it acceptable to note N/A in the Alternate section of the bid form or will you be providing a revised bid form?
Response: Document 00 41 13, Bid Form and Proposal, has been amended to remove the Add Alternate. An amended Document 00 41 13, Bid Form and Proposal, will be issued to reflect this change with the next Addendum issuance.
Question 26
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: Spec Section 01 32 13 – Scheduling of Work – notes that a cost and resource loaded schedule is required for this project. We recommend that the District remove the requirement for cost loading as it adds a level of complexity that isn’t necessary and will save money on the project.
Response: Provide cost and resource loaded schedules as specified.
Question 27
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: The PLA dated 7/21/09 was provided via link in the project manual, but we don’t see a PLA Letter of Assent listed with the other required bid forms from General Contractors on bid day. Do you require a PLA Letter of Assent from all General Contractors with their bids? Also, please confirm that the PLA dated 7/21/09 is the most current PLA that GCs and all subcontractors will be required to uphold the requirements of for the project. If there is an amendment, please provide at your earliest convenience.
Response: "No, all bidders do not have to submit a letter of assent with their bids. Only the awarded bidder will be required to do so. Yes, the PLA dated 7/21/09 is the most current PLA and all subcontractors will be required to uphold the requirements of the Project Labor Agreement. The Letter of Assent will be included as Appendix N, in Addendum 3 and is available now under the Documents section of the project."
Question 28
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: Re: Revised SLBE/SELBE Program provided in Addendum #1 1) Please specify what “nonprofessional services” are for a “goods and nonprofessional services” firm. 2) Page 2 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" states that we should list each SLBE and SELBE on the Subcontractor List form, clearly identifying the SLBE & SELBE status and the Dollar Amount of work each subcontractor will perform (on bid day). Please note that the Sub List due with the bid does not have any lines or areas to note whether subs are SLBE / SELBE or the dollar amount. Where should we note this info on bid day or will you be providing a revised sub list? 3) Page 2 and 3 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" #4 and #5 - require that the SLBE/SELBE Self Certification Affidavits and accompanying required information for SLBE/SELBE subs noted on our bid day sub list should be submitted within 48 hours after the bid opening. Please note that 48 hours after bid opening would fall on Saturday 1/18/25 at 2PM. Also, if pushed to Monday 1/20 – that is MLK Jr. day and a holiday for most firms and most likely the district. Please clarify the exact date and time that SLBE/SELBE Affidavits are due. Also, refer to #7 below requesting more time to collect this information. 4) Please state the delivery method for submittal of the SLBE/SELBE post bid info. If you require a hardcopy, please specify exact address and contact person. If you require an electronic submittal, please specify the email address. Or if to be uploaded to Vendor Registry - whether the portal will be reopened after bid close for the submittal. 5) Please let us know if the documents due after the bid to prove use of SLBE/SELBE are required of all general contractors submitting bids or only from the low bidder determined at bid opening. 6) Page 3 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" under #5 very last paragraph states that "Firms claiming SLBE and SELBE status in the self-certification affidavit will be required to submit proof of residency and revenue 48 hours after bid opening. Please clarify if "Firms" noted above refers to General Contractors or Subcontractors or both. 7) The Proof of Residency and Revenue noted above consist of a copy of a contract to perform work, to rent space or equipment, or for other business services, executed from their local address, and the firm's tax returns for the past 3 consecutive years. Please note that if proof of residency and revenue noted above are required of SLBE/SELBE subcontractors - 48 hours to collect this information and review it for accuracy is not sufficient time. We request at least a week to collect this proof IF required of subcontractors. 8) Please note that tax returns are very confidential and subcontractors may be hesitant to provide this documentation if you do not decide to remove this requirement. Would it be sufficient for SLBE/SELBE subs to substitute tax returns for a copy of their SLBE/SELBE certification letter form an acceptable certification agency?
Response: 1) Non-Professional Services means all services, other than Professional Services, including construction, repair and maintenance services. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 2) Bidders will need to complete the Peralta Community College District (PCCD) Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program. 3) Per the updated PCCD SLBE Policy, bidders are no longer required to submit the SLBE/SELBE Self Certification Affidavits. Bidders are to submit the Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program at the time of bid. 4) Post bid documentation to be delivered to: Mr. John Hiebert Buyer – Contract Specialist Department of Finance & Administration - Purchasing Peralta Community College District 333 East 8th Street Oakland, CA 94606 Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 5) Information is required from all bidders submitting bids for this project. 6) See response to Question 30.3, above. This requirement has been removed. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 7) Bidders to provide SLBE/ SELBE "certifying agency" and "certification number, if applicable" on the Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program at the time of bid. This will address proof of residency. See revenue requirements response in Question 30.8, below. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 8) Since Peralta Community College District (PCCD) is not a certifying agency, PCCD accepts certifications from various agencies. Being that each agency has a different revenue threshold for SLBE certifications, in some cases, tax returns are needed to verify if a firm meets PCCD's SLBE/SELBE status. Per the District, SLBE certifications requiring tax returns for proof of revenue are to be submitted within ten (10) business days of bid opening. Firms certified with Port of Oakland (as a Very, Small Local Business) and/ or City of Oakland (as a SLBE) are not required to submit additional verification/documentation because these certifications meet PCCD's revenue size
Question 29
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Drawing Reference: T0.11 Detail 2 The 50 pair copper coming from the Tower building, Through Building E and landing in the new Library Building is not calling for Building Entrance Protection. Please confirm that BEP's are not required.
Response: Provide a wall mounted BEP panel in Library BDF for the 50-pair copper cable coming from the Laney College tower MDF.
Question 30
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Is the Room Scheduler Panel required for this project? 274116 1.5 N - Provide room scheduling device outside..... 274116 2.2 K - Room scheduling display, ... Confirm finish with architect. 274116 3.3 M.2 - Room Scheduling displays will be provided in the future. Provide cabling to support future system.
Response: The room scheduler is part of the scope. Specification Section 27 41 16, Integrated Audiovisual, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda.
Question 31
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Acoustical Wall Panel (AWP 1) do not align with the Finish Schedule A9.10 (Misplacement/Missing Call Out). Elevation A5.14/6N room 135 Calls for AWP 1 at East Wall but per the Finish Schedule calls for West Wall, or A5.15/9N #162 Calls for (AWP 1) but the Finish Schedule is missing the call-out. This Occurs throughout the Elevations. Please Confirm we are to follow the Hatch and Call-Out per Elevations due to discrepancies with the finish schedule and void the finish schedule reference due to inconsistencies with the plans.
Response: Use the interior elevations for location and quantity of wall finishes and elements, including Acoustical Wall Panel AWP-1 and Marker Boards.
Question 32
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Atrium Elevation A5.12 shows L2 Atrium South at starting and end point but there are no graphic identifying the elevation break and then continuing on at the mid-section. Please advise whether the graphical void on A5.12/L2 intent is to compact the elevation width span to better fit on the plan sheet.
Response: The void is a graphical break to compact the elevation to fit on the page. The materials are to extend continuously the full width of the south side of the Atrium opening.
Question 33
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 07 42 13 Metal Wall Panels: Sub section 2.6 calls for Stainless Steel soffit panels with a polished finish. Please clarify if and where these occur.
Response: Metal panel soffits are to be aluminum. Specification Section 07 42 13 will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda.
Question 34
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: • Acoustical Wall Panel (AWP 1) do not align with the Finish Schedule A9.10 (Misplacement/Missing Call Out). Elevation A5.14/6N room 135 Calls for AWP 1 at East Wall but per the Finish Schedule calls for West Wall, or A5.15/9N #162 Calls for (AWP 1) but the Finish Schedule is missing the call-out. This Occurs throughout the Elevations. Please Confirm we are to follow the Hatch and Call-Out per Elevations due to discrepancies with the finish schedule and void the finish schedule reference due to inconsistencies with the plans. • Atrium Elevation A5.12 shows L2 Atrium South at starting and end point but there are no graphic identifying the elevation break and then continuing on at the mid-section. Please advise whether the graphical void on A5.12/L2 intent is to compact the elevation width span to better fit on the plan sheet.
Response: 1) See response to Bidder Question 34. 2) See response to Bidder Question 35.
Question 35
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Div 25 RFIs, Could you please confirm that the Div 25 contractor shall provide 10 submittal packages per 25 0000,1.7, C. Could you please confirm that Div 25 contractor shall provide (40) hours operator training per 25 00 00, 3.15, C.
Response: Confirmed.
Question 36
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Design Suite AV - Should anything be provided for the Design Suite? Sheets T5.24A and T5.24B are showing AV locations however there were no AV parts called out in the 274116 specs. Please clarify.
Response: These are OFOI items.
Question 37
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Wiring diagram for Design Suite - Please provide a wiring diagram for the AV system in the Design Suite.
Response: These are OFOI items.
Question 38
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116- Assistive listening QTY - Please clarify how many total assistive listening systems should be provided for this project. The 274116 specs say to provide " as required." However this number can vary depended on if the client plans to share systems between any rooms. Please clarify if EACH classroom should get their OWN system or will any rooms be sharing the system as needed?
Response: Bidder shall adhere to CBC section 11B-219 when calculating device quantities.
Question 39
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Basket Tray and Ladder Racks - What sections are responsible for providing the Basket Tray and Ladder Racks?
Response: General Contractor to determine responsibility.
Question 40
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 1. What is the terrazzo design mix or selected terrazzo for Stair C? 2. Precast terrazzo landing panels can be cast to a maximum of 20 SF. The two terrazzo landings exceed this. We would like to pour the landings in place to minimize the appearance of grout joints. We would like to include the poured-in-place landings as an alt. Would that be acceptable? 3. In specification section 096623 1.7 B.1 the mockups include the first 3 stair treads. Will the mockups be used in the completed work?
Response: 1) Per Specifications 09 00 00 and 09 66 23, the treads and landings are to be custom size PRECAST EPOXY TERRAZZO. The basis of design is from Wausau Tile or equal, as selected from their standard options. 2) It is acceptable to provide the landings in multiple precast pieces or as a poured-in-place terrazzo system. In either condition, layout to be approved by the architect in shop drawing submittals and sample approval is required to match the cast-in-place landings to the selected pre-cast treads. 3) The stair tread mockups shall be reviewed prior to final installation on the stair, and if approved, can be installed as completed work.
Question 41
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: There are aluminum frames that show the detail of 7/A8.53. Some show a sidelite elevation with an SF## type (Storefront?) I am asking because detail 7/A8.53 shows an interior aluminum frame (Spec 081116 – Knock-down wrap-around wall). Since the detail shows a wraparound frame with a trim (not a storefront detail) (See attached clips of the detail), shouldn’t the frame be part of Spec 081116 and not a storefront frame? I ask because the elevation SF## type designates a storefront frame. There are 4 wood doors which have a comment of "Noise Control". The spec 083473 only refers to doors manufactured by Krieger or Noise Barrier or equal. They are both manufacturers of hollow metal sound control and not wood. Please allow us to provide STC doors as manufactured by the same wood door manufacturer we are providing for Spec 081416. Finally regarding STC doors, Opening 285.1 shows a detail of 2/A8.53. This detail is for an aluminum frame. STC doors (Wood or Aluminum) have not been rated or certified for sound control with an aluminum frame. For them to achieve this SC rating a HM frame must be used. Please change the detail to an HM frame. In the remarks column on the door schedule, there is a remark of "G" at a few openings. What does this refer to?
Response: 1) In the documents SF/Storefront refers to multiple glazing systems, both traditional storefront and knock-down interior glazing systems. The drawings use the GS4 and GS5 designation to identify which type to provide. schedule and glazing sheets. 2) Krieger offers STC rated wood veneer doors, for example NC3-WD-STC45 for a wood veneer STC-45 assembly. The required STC for this project is STC-45. The doors, frames and compression sound seal systems are all provided as one tested unit. The acoustical doors and frames are to be as specified in 08 34 73. 3) Details for the acoustical doors are to be 6/A8.41. 4) 'G' is a reference to gasket type 'G' (1/A8.41). 'SG' are Sound Gasketed doors per 5/A8.41 and 'DG' doors are double sound gasketed. Sheet A2.51, Door Schedule and Types, will be updated to reflect these change in the next upcoming Addenda."
Question 42
Posted: 1/10/2025
Question: The plans calls for an Edwards fire alarm system but the specifications call for a Simplex system. Please advise what is required.
Response: Within Addendum 2, Item ADD 2.007, Specification Section 28 31 11 Digital, Addressable Fire-Alarm System does not state an manufacturer and Item ADD 2.015, Sheet FA.00 - Fire Alarm General Notes and Legend notes an Edwards system. Provide Edwards per Schedule on Sheet FA.00.
Question 43
Posted: 1/14/2025
Question: Our firm is supported by Markel Surety. A top 15 surety company based on annual gross written premium, as reported by The Surety & Fidelity Association. They provide surety performance and payment bonds for us. Based on their experience, they advise that certain surety provisions in the proposed contract documents unduly increase the risk to the surety and us as contractor and could limit the availability of bonds, despite our strong capabilities and credit quality. First, Section 24 of the General Conditions requires a surety response within an unrealistically short time frame. In particular, 24.2.2 states in part: 24.2.2.1 Upon the occurrence at District's sole determination of any of the above conditions, District may, without prejudice to any other right or remedy, serve written notice upon Contractor and its Surety of District's termination of this Contract and/or the Contractor’s right to perform the work of the Contract. This notice will contain the reasons for termination. Unless, within three (3) days after the service of the notice, any and all condition(s) shall cease, and any and all violation(s) shall cease, or arrangement satisfactory to District for the correction of the condition(s) and/or violation(s) be made, this Contract and/or the Contractor’s right to perform the Work of the Contract shall cease and terminate. Upon termination, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the entire Work is finished. 24.2.2.2 Upon Termination, District may immediately serve written notice of tender upon Surety whereby Surety shall have the right to take over and perform this Contract only if Surety: 24.2.2.2.1 Within three (3) days after service upon it of the notice of tender, gives District written notice of Surety’s intention to take over and perform this Contract; and 24.2.2.2.2 Commences performance of this Contract within three (3) days from date of serving of its notice to District. Particularly considering the size of this project, three days is not an adequate amount of time to provide a meaningful response. A performance bond claim can be quite complex with a multitude of facts and the competing interests of the contractor and obligee in play. A surety generally conducts an investigation to assess the default, including the positions of all the parties of the bond, and makes a determination how best to proceed. Further, if a default has occurred and the surety must complete the contract, it must select a qualified contractor who can complete the project efficiently and economically. The investigation of a claim and the ultimate selection of a completing contractor take time. Although all parties' interests are served when the surety responds promptly and in a timely manner, three days is an insufficient amount of time to resolve the claim adequately. We recommend that the time to respond be extended to 30 days. Second, 24.2.2.2 of the General Conditions and the proposed bond form seem to limit the surety’s remedy upon termination to simply taking over the work. Sureties typically have multiple options in remedying a default: take over the project, tender a completion contractor to the obligee or make a financial settlement with the obligee. A surety carefully considers these options and remedies the default in a way that is most appropriate based on the facts of a particular case and dialogue with the contractor and obligee. A takeover may not be the appropriate remedy in a given case. In such a case, claims costs may be higher than necessary for the surety and ultimately for the contractor. We suggest that this provision and the bond form should be revised to clearly provide the surety the necessary flexibility in remedying a default. Third, the bond form states, “Surety expressly agrees that the District may reject any contractor or subcontractor proposed by Surety to fulfill its obligations in the event of default by the Principal.” As you know, obtaining a completion contractor in this market is very difficult. We have found that if the surety’s options are restricted, the completion costs can escalate significantly. In the interest of controlling completions costs and making more of the contract balance available for completion, selection of a completion contractor should be the surety’s decision. At the very least, the selection should be predicated on the District’s consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Fourth, based on the language in the performance bond, the surety’s obligation to obtain bids for a completion contractor is not explicitly conditioned on “event of default”. The paragraph simply begins with, “at the District’s sole discretion and election,”. The underwriting and pricing of a surety bond contemplate that the surety’s obligation is conditioned on a default of the contract. Although it may not have been the intention of the District to require a bond without such condition, we recommend explicitly adding the default of the contractor as a trigger to the surety’s obligations under the bond. Fifth, the performance bond sets forth certain events that shall not affect the surety's obligations under the bond. In particular, the form states, “The Surety also stipulates and agrees that it shall not be exonerated or released from the obligation of this bond by any overpayment or underpayment by the District that is based upon estimates approved by the Architect.” If the owner pays for work not performed, thereby reducing the contract balance available to complete the work, the excess cost to complete over the remaining contract is increased, to the detriment of the surety. In underwriting the risk, the surety contemplates that contract funds will be available to complete the work in the event it must step in and take over the project. Under this bond provision, the owner conceivably could pay the contractor 100% of the contract on the first day of the project (contrary to the terms and conditions of the contract) and still expect the surety to complete the work in the event of a default. We recommend that this provision should be deleted. At least it should reflect the common law applicable to such a case, which is that the surety is discharged to the extent that it is prejudiced by the overpayment. Sixth, we request clarification with respect to the following sentence in the bond form: “Nothing herein shall limit the District’s rights or the Contractor or Surety’s obligations under the Contract, law or equity, including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15.” Section 337.15 is a limitation period (statute of repose) limiting the time to bring a suit, particularly for a latent defect. This section does not really establish a right of the District or an obligation of the contractor or surety. Surety provisions in bond forms and contract documents that increase the surety's and contractor’s risk ultimately are harmful for competition. A surety addresses increased risk by tightening its underwriting thresholds, thereby restricting competition for the project. In addition, a contractor that will submit a bid may price the increased risk accordingly. The increased costs from the use of the Performance Bond outweigh any benefits to the District. We ask that the District consider revisions to the forms that will present a more reasonable risk for the surety. We would be happy to work with the District in suggesting revised language. Thank you for your consideration.
Response: After review with District's General Counsel, the District will keep both the existing contract and the performance bond language as is.
Question 44
Posted: 1/16/2025
Question: Are there any submission requirements for a site security subcontractor? We have already sent company info and SLEB docs to all GCCs.
Response: Bidders will include subcontractor information as per Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program. See response to Bidder Question 30.2.
Posted: 11/22/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum One
Overview: Addendum One. Project schedule updates, responses to RFI, existing document clarifications.
Documents:
Posted: 12/20/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum Two
Overview: Bid opening video meeting invitation, responses to RFI, etc.
Documents:
Posted: 1/10/2025
Type of Addition: Addendum Three
Overview: Addendum Three contains project schedule changes, etc.
Documents:
Posted: 1/18/2025
Type of Addition: Addendum Four
Overview: Responses to questions, changes to and addition of contract documents.
Documents:
Posted: 2/4/2025
Type of Addition: Designated subcontractors list for all three bids
Overview:
Documents:
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: There is a Q&A provided with the re-bid documents 1) please confirm that answers provided in the orig. bid's Q&A are to be incorporated into the bid on 12/12, 2) The Q&A references, “See Addendum…” in several areas as well as indicates new plan sheets and specification sections that were issued during the prior bid. Please confirm that these plan sheets and spec sections have been included in the new bid set issued for this project. 2) if not, please provide them as well as the addenda from the previous bid.
Response: If referring to Appendix G- Bid 23 24 03 Bidder Questions & District Responses, then yes/ confirmed. See blocked note on Sheet 1 shown in red text: Appendix G- Bid 23 24 03 Bidder Questions & District Responses NOTE TO BIDDERS REGARDING BID 24 25/01: Responses to these bidder questions have been incorporated into the Re-Issue to Bid documents dated August 9, 2024
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: Section 313213 - DMM GROUND IMPROVEMENT. Table A.1: Minimum DMM Ar and Maximum DMM Grid Spacing requires Minimum Ar = 50% at Specified Unconfined Compression Strength = 125 PSI for Option1. 3.15 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, Paragraph 2 states: “Two alternative specified unconfined compressive strengths are provided with corresponding minimum Ar and maximum grid spacing in Table A.1. The DMM Contractor shall select one of these options for the entire project.” Please provide the second alternative.
Response: Values provided in Table A.1 are not be reduced. Item 3.15 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, Paragraph 2 is to be deleted as only one (1) value is provided in Table A.1.
Posted: 10/1/2024
Question: Is it possible to reduce the Unconfined Compression Strength from 125 psi @ Minimum Ar = 50% to 95 psi @ Minimum Ar = 66%?
Response: Unconfined Compression Strength is not to be reduced.
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: Is the Alameda County SLEB consider a SLBE under this contract?
Response: SLBE certification with Alameda County will count as SLBE with PCCD as long as the firm is located within the six PCCD cities (Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland, Piedmont) and are within the PCCD revenue thresholds (Construction services - $11.5M or less; Goods and Non-professional services - $6.5M or less; Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services - $5M or less).
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: “Please clarify if SLBE and SELBE subcontractors listed need to serve a commercially useful function as described in 00 45 46.13-1: Commercially Useful Function: Shall mean a business is directly responsible for providing the materials, equipment, supplies or services to the District as required by the contract solicitation. The business performs work that is normal for its business services and carries out its obligation by actually performing, managing, or supervising the work involved. The business is not Commercially Useful if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of SLBE or SELBE participation. This would mean that GCs cannot list a SLBE or SELBE subcontractor that has a General A and/or B license and have the general subcontractor carry enough non-SLBE/SELBE sub-tier trades to meet the 25% mandatory SLBE/SELBE goal. This format will be considered a pass-through arrangement, resulting in the bidding GC being deemed non-responsive.”
Response: Yes, please refer to the updated Small, Local Business Enterprise (SLBE) Board Policy for more information. Below is the link to the SLBE Program: https://build.peralta.edu/small-local-business-program.
Posted: 10/8/2024
Question: The Construction General Permit 2009-0009-DWQ is out of date. This is listed under Document 01 57 00 of the General Requirements. The current CGP Order number is 2022-0057-DWQ. Would you consider changing it?
Response: Note revision to Document 01 57 00, SWPPP, Item 1.2.A. "During the construction period, the Contractor is responsible for insuring compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act of 1987, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) No. CA S000002, the State Water Resources Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Construction General Permit (CGP) Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ(old number) 2022-0057 DWQ(new number), and subsequent implementation of these laws and orders by local and regional jurisdictions."" WILL BE NOTED IN FUTURE ADDENDUM 01."
Posted: 10/9/2024
Question: Can you please post the attendance list from the 1st mandatory Zoom meeting that was held on October 8th?
Response: The sign in sheet to the October 8th meeting has now been posted. It is Appendix J under project Documents.
Posted: 10/9/2024
Question: GC's will need to attend two of three SLBE networking meetings. Please clarify when and where these meetings will be held.
Response: See Appendix H- Laney L&LRC SLBE Outreach Flyer for dates, times and locations.
Posted: 10/29/2024
Question: SECTION 250000 Could you please submit the following RFIs? - Could you please confirm that BAS contractor should furnish all the Valves, Actuators, AFMS, BTU and Flow Meters for installation by others? o Please confirm the Air Monitor, model OAM II-2322-1BMMM is preferred model number for AFMS. o Please confirm the Turbine Meter (Recordall) 6” & 3 “ are preferred Flow Meters. o Confirm BAS contractor is responsible for all conduits and chases to all peripherals. - Could you please confirm that the BAS contractor should provide the required 120V circuit for each TCP? o Confirm BAS contractor is responsible for all conduits and chases to all peripherals. - Please confirm the controller can be installed within 20 feet of the corresponding ceiling fan. - For lighting control and power monitoring please confirm DIV.26 contractor is furnishing and installing IP drop(s). - Please confirm that Mechanical Contractor furnishes and installs line voltage thermostat for Transfer Fans and wired by Div. 26. - Please verify BAS contractor carries the required point licensing for Delta Control BMS. - Are VAV boxes provided with factory-installed controllers? - Please confirm conduits are required in open spaces for low voltage and BACnet communication wiring. - Please confirm whether this project requires buying America Certification or not.
Response: (1) Refer to coordination table in Section 230501. Sensor wells, meters and other pipe-mounted control devices are supplied by Division 25, installed by Division 23, and wired by Division 25. Valve actuators are installed by Division 25 if not supplied with the valve. (2) OAM II is the preferred AFMS. Provide manufacturer recommended number of uni-sensors—each uni-senor can cover up to 30 ft2. (3) See Section 250000 2.0L.1 for FM-1 type flow meter and 2.9L.6 from FM-6 type flow meter requirements. FM-6 meters are used for domestic water consumption and domestic hot water consumption. FM-1 meters are used as part of BTU-1 for CHW and HHW BTUH measurement. (4) See Section 250000 3.9A. Division 25 contractor is responsible for all wiring, wiring connections, and raceways unless specifically indicated in Division 26 drawings otherwise. Division 25 is responsible for control and signal wiring and appropriate raceways, as well. See Section 250000 3.10A and 3.10B. (5) "TCPs noted on mechanical drawings have 120V power provided by Division 26. See Division 26 Electrical Drawings for power locations pre-allocated for BAS system. See Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Remark 10." (6) See response to Question 9.04, above. Appears to be a duplicate. (7) Intent is to locate fan controls near lighting and shade controls for each space. Some fans may be further than 20 feet from their corresponding controllers. Provide fan control wiring per 12/BAS0.0.1 in lengths as required from fans to controllers. (8) Connection from BAS to gateways provided by Division 25 per Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row E.1 (lighting control gateway) and Remark 12 (power monitoring gateway). (9) Per Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row D.3, Division 25 contractor supplies line voltage thermostats, and Division 26 installs and wires them. (10) Correct. See Section 250000 2.11B. (11) No. See Section 230501 Interface/Responsibility Matrix (1.1B.3) Row K.3. VAV controllers provided by Division 25. (12) All low voltage and communication wiring shall be installed in UL Listed approved raceway where exposed to occupant view per Section 250000 3.10A.3.b.1)c). (13) There are no Buy American Certification requirements for this project.
Posted: 10/31/2024
Question: Looking at the SLBE outreach flyer, it says there is a 25% requirement for SLBE. Looking at section 00 4546 it states if you get 25% you get a bid discount and that there is a 25% annual program goal but I do not see that it is a requirement. Are we missing something? Is it a requirement or a goal where you get a bid discount?
Response: According to the approved Peralta Community College District Board Policy 6355, there is a 25% SLBE requirement for this project. This is a requirement set forth by the District. By exceeding the 25% SLBE requirement, firms can earn three- to five-percent bidding preference.
Posted: 10/31/2024
Question: If we were to JV the project with an SLBE contractor, I am not seeing how JV Participation is accounted for in section 00 4546. Can you please advise?
Response: See SLBE participation values are published in Document 00 45 46.13-Addendum 1.
Posted: 11/13/2024
Question: Please help to remove the confusion on the part of general contractors and subcontractors as to whether they need to prequalify in order to bid on this project. If there is a prequalification required - please provide the specific instructions on how and where to prequalify since we have heard that we can no longer prequalify on Quality Bidders. It would be appreciated if you provided the prequalification information, as well as the new bid date of 1/16/25, in an addendum. Thank you!
Response: The Peralta Community College District has discontinued the use of Quality Bidders with Colbi Technologies. Currently, bidder qualifications will be assessed upon the submission of a bid for a district project. Any updates to the district's process will be communicated to our bidder and vendor communities.
Posted: 11/19/2024
Question: Will Laney College approve Library Bureau Steel as an acceptable manufacturer for Section 11 51 23 (Library Stack Systems)? LBS meets all the specifications under 115123. Library Bureau Steel is the oldest library shelving manufacturer in the USA, started in 1876 by Melvil Dewey, the creator of the Dewey Decimal System.
Response: All substitutions are to follow requirements outlined in Document 01 25 13, Product Options and Substitutions and Document 01 25 16, Substitution Request Procedures. Complete and submit the “Substitution Request Form” in Document 01 25 16 for consideration. If acceptable, it will be noted in a forthcoming Addenda. Submit as a separate Bidder Question.
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Reference 004546.13. 1) For clarity please confirm that the first sentence can/should read: a. “The District is committed to ensure equal opportunity and equitable treatment in awarding and managing its public contracts and has established an annual overall program goal of twenty-five percent (25%) participation for business with SLBE and SELBE certificates of Alameda County.” OR b. “The District is committed to ensure equal opportunity and equitable treatment in awarding and managing its public contracts and has established an annual overall program goal of twenty-five percent (25%) participation for business with SLBE and SELBE certificates in the specified cities of XYZ.” c. Note: stating “25% for small local businesses” is too vague and does not have any mention of the geographic requirements. 2) In the definitions section, SLBE and SELBE appear to be project-specific definitions. There are Federal, State, County, and even city-specific SLBE and SELBE certificates that have different annual revenue limits. For example, the Federal the limit for SLBE is $19M to 45M depending if it’s a subcontractor or general contractor. a. I would kindly suggest and request that only the project-eligible entities for providing recognized SLBE and SELBE certificates be listed and, it be mentioned if these are project-specific limits rather than limits defined by the entity who provides the certification. 3) It has been the understanding that this project is looking for SLBE and SELBE subs who have this certification from Alameda County. As can be found on their website: https://sleb.acgov.org/#/find-a-supplier/ a. This specification is significantly limiting to the geographic location requirements of ONLY “Albany, Alameda, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland, or Piedmont” it does not include major locations such as Hayward, Fremont, or San Leandro. Clarify if this is the intent.
Response: 1) Geographic Location Requirements are noted on page 2 of Document 00 45 46.13. 2) See Item ADD-1.003; Bidder Question 4. 3)The District's market area does not include all of Alameda County. Geographic Location Requirements are noted on page 2 of Document 00 45 46.13
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: 034819 - Precast Concrete Stair Treads is a provided spec but not listed in the table of contents 00 01 10. Please confirm this spec is applicable to the project
Response: AMENDED: Specification Section 03 48 19 Precast Concrete Stair Treads is to be removed from the Project Manual. See Specification Section 09 66 23, Precast Epoxy Terrazzo for the Stair C, stair tread scope. A revised Document 00 01 10, Table of Contents will be amended to reflect this change and issued in Addendum 2.
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: 311316 - Site Concrete spec has conflicting titles. Appears it should be 321316
Response: The correct Specification Section is 321316, Site Concrete. The specification number on page 1 of the section will be corrected and issued as part of Addendum 2.
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Please advise where is the exterior curtain wall schedule. There appears only to be an interior glazing system schedule. Please provide one if it does not exist.
Response: Exterior curtain wall dimensions and quantities are located on the exterior elevations, Sheets A3.11-A3.14. Basis of design for CW types are designated on the elevations and described in the Specification Section 08 44 13, Item 2.4.
Posted: 11/20/2024
Question: Please let us know the time and date of the RFI deadline. Thank you!
Response: See Appendix M, Updated Bid Schedule
Posted: 11/22/2024
Question: Reference A8.51, A8.52, A8.53. There are two different Storefront systems in the same elevation, they have detailed Center Set & Front Set Storefront systems and they cant be used together because the Plane of glass are in different location. We need to know which elevations are Front Set and what are Center Cet.
Response: A column for "Orientation" was added to Sheet A8.51, Interior Storefront Schedule to designate Front or Center set. New Detail 30/A8.53 GS5 - Vertical Transition @ Front/Back added and called out in SF6 on A8.51. Sill details updated to 10/A8.53 in SF36, SF37, SF44 & SF45 on A8.52. This update will be included as part of Addendum 2.
Posted: 11/26/2024
Question: Please publish the compete Revit model for the building.
Response: The Revit model will be provided to the awarded bidder after receipt of their signature release for electronic files. The Revit model will not be available to bidders prior to bid opening.
Posted: 11/27/2024
Question: 00 01 00 Table of Contents lists 00 41 00 Bid Proposal as being included with the project manual; however, it is missing. Please provide 00 41 00.
Response: There is no Document 00 41 00, Bid Proposal listed on Document 00 01 00, Table of Contents dated August 9, 2024 for the Laney College Library and Learning Resource Center Project (Bid No. 24 25/01). Document 00 41 13, Bid Proposal and Form is explicitly identified. Use Document 00 41 13, Bid Proposal and Form as noted, provided and included with your respective bid submission.
Posted: 12/19/2024
Question: Please confirm if it's acceptable to use TRD (Trench cutting Re-mixing Deep wall) soil mixing techniques to install the DMM Ground Improvements.
Response: Bidder/ Contractor to follow recommendations of the geotechnical report and the project specifications for deep mixing method (DMM). Trench cutting and remixing deep soil mix walls (TRD) uses different equipment and would require an additional DSA review.
Posted: 12/30/2024
Question: 1. Please provide locations for 4 bike racks per specs 2.2.b section 32 30 00. 2. Please provide irrigation mainline size, electrical conduit, and sleeve size at North of Laney Library & Learning Resource Center on sheet L7.01 3. Refer to L1.01, symbol of rock mulch shows at Northeast of Laney Library & Learning Resource Center. However, on sheet L5.01, it is not showed. Please clarify.
Response: 1) Provide 4 bike racks per spec, location to be coordinated with the District at a later date. Assume a 14" deep x 18" x 31.5" concrete footing for each rack. 2) For bidding purposes, Contractor to assume 4” mainline, based on historic as-builts. This is to be verified in field per notes on Sheet L7.01 to match existing. Electrical conduit and sleeve size criteria are provided in Specification Section 32 84 00. 3) Correct, locations for rock mulch documented on Sheet L1.01. See Sheet L0.01 for clarification for mulch type in Planting Legend.
Posted: 12/30/2024
Question: Section 00 7313 item 11 - 10.1.1.2.3.4 requires a value of not less than 10% for close-out documentation on the SOV. For an $80M project that is $8M! With 5% or $4M already being held for retention and then wanting another $8M to be held for a $50K item until the end of the job, that is really just a 15% retention and puts a huge burden on a contractor and being underbilled on a project throughout. This will force us to include a large sum of money to our bid for financing the project based on this requirement. Money that the district could use toward actual work product and helping keep the budget of the project intact. We ask that this provision be removed or at least reduced to something more reasonable like $50K or $100K?
Response: Delete Item 11, Preliminary Schedule of Values within Document 00 73 13, Special Conditions. Refer to Section 10.1, Schedule of Work, Schedule of Submittals and Schedule of Values in Document 00 72 13, General Conditions. An amended Document 00 73 13, Special Conditions, will be issued to reflect this change with the next Addendum issuance.
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: The bid form has an alternate noted, however, Addendum #2 has a revised Sheet G0.00 that instructs us to remove reference to the alternate. Is this correct? If correct, is it acceptable to note N/A in the Alternate section of the bid form or will you be providing a revised bid form?
Response: Document 00 41 13, Bid Form and Proposal, has been amended to remove the Add Alternate. An amended Document 00 41 13, Bid Form and Proposal, will be issued to reflect this change with the next Addendum issuance.
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: Spec Section 01 32 13 – Scheduling of Work – notes that a cost and resource loaded schedule is required for this project. We recommend that the District remove the requirement for cost loading as it adds a level of complexity that isn’t necessary and will save money on the project.
Response: Provide cost and resource loaded schedules as specified.
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: The PLA dated 7/21/09 was provided via link in the project manual, but we don’t see a PLA Letter of Assent listed with the other required bid forms from General Contractors on bid day. Do you require a PLA Letter of Assent from all General Contractors with their bids? Also, please confirm that the PLA dated 7/21/09 is the most current PLA that GCs and all subcontractors will be required to uphold the requirements of for the project. If there is an amendment, please provide at your earliest convenience.
Response: "No, all bidders do not have to submit a letter of assent with their bids. Only the awarded bidder will be required to do so. Yes, the PLA dated 7/21/09 is the most current PLA and all subcontractors will be required to uphold the requirements of the Project Labor Agreement. The Letter of Assent will be included as Appendix N, in Addendum 3 and is available now under the Documents section of the project."
Posted: 1/2/2025
Question: Re: Revised SLBE/SELBE Program provided in Addendum #1 1) Please specify what “nonprofessional services” are for a “goods and nonprofessional services” firm. 2) Page 2 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" states that we should list each SLBE and SELBE on the Subcontractor List form, clearly identifying the SLBE & SELBE status and the Dollar Amount of work each subcontractor will perform (on bid day). Please note that the Sub List due with the bid does not have any lines or areas to note whether subs are SLBE / SELBE or the dollar amount. Where should we note this info on bid day or will you be providing a revised sub list? 3) Page 2 and 3 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" #4 and #5 - require that the SLBE/SELBE Self Certification Affidavits and accompanying required information for SLBE/SELBE subs noted on our bid day sub list should be submitted within 48 hours after the bid opening. Please note that 48 hours after bid opening would fall on Saturday 1/18/25 at 2PM. Also, if pushed to Monday 1/20 – that is MLK Jr. day and a holiday for most firms and most likely the district. Please clarify the exact date and time that SLBE/SELBE Affidavits are due. Also, refer to #7 below requesting more time to collect this information. 4) Please state the delivery method for submittal of the SLBE/SELBE post bid info. If you require a hardcopy, please specify exact address and contact person. If you require an electronic submittal, please specify the email address. Or if to be uploaded to Vendor Registry - whether the portal will be reopened after bid close for the submittal. 5) Please let us know if the documents due after the bid to prove use of SLBE/SELBE are required of all general contractors submitting bids or only from the low bidder determined at bid opening. 6) Page 3 of the revised program under "Subcontractors" under #5 very last paragraph states that "Firms claiming SLBE and SELBE status in the self-certification affidavit will be required to submit proof of residency and revenue 48 hours after bid opening. Please clarify if "Firms" noted above refers to General Contractors or Subcontractors or both. 7) The Proof of Residency and Revenue noted above consist of a copy of a contract to perform work, to rent space or equipment, or for other business services, executed from their local address, and the firm's tax returns for the past 3 consecutive years. Please note that if proof of residency and revenue noted above are required of SLBE/SELBE subcontractors - 48 hours to collect this information and review it for accuracy is not sufficient time. We request at least a week to collect this proof IF required of subcontractors. 8) Please note that tax returns are very confidential and subcontractors may be hesitant to provide this documentation if you do not decide to remove this requirement. Would it be sufficient for SLBE/SELBE subs to substitute tax returns for a copy of their SLBE/SELBE certification letter form an acceptable certification agency?
Response: 1) Non-Professional Services means all services, other than Professional Services, including construction, repair and maintenance services. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 2) Bidders will need to complete the Peralta Community College District (PCCD) Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program. 3) Per the updated PCCD SLBE Policy, bidders are no longer required to submit the SLBE/SELBE Self Certification Affidavits. Bidders are to submit the Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program at the time of bid. 4) Post bid documentation to be delivered to: Mr. John Hiebert Buyer – Contract Specialist Department of Finance & Administration - Purchasing Peralta Community College District 333 East 8th Street Oakland, CA 94606 Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 5) Information is required from all bidders submitting bids for this project. 6) See response to Question 30.3, above. This requirement has been removed. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 7) Bidders to provide SLBE/ SELBE "certifying agency" and "certification number, if applicable" on the Small Local Business Enterprise Participation Worksheet(s) that is included in Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program at the time of bid. This will address proof of residency. See revenue requirements response in Question 30.8, below. Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE SELBE Program, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda. 8) Since Peralta Community College District (PCCD) is not a certifying agency, PCCD accepts certifications from various agencies. Being that each agency has a different revenue threshold for SLBE certifications, in some cases, tax returns are needed to verify if a firm meets PCCD's SLBE/SELBE status. Per the District, SLBE certifications requiring tax returns for proof of revenue are to be submitted within ten (10) business days of bid opening. Firms certified with Port of Oakland (as a Very, Small Local Business) and/ or City of Oakland (as a SLBE) are not required to submit additional verification/documentation because these certifications meet PCCD's revenue size
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Drawing Reference: T0.11 Detail 2 The 50 pair copper coming from the Tower building, Through Building E and landing in the new Library Building is not calling for Building Entrance Protection. Please confirm that BEP's are not required.
Response: Provide a wall mounted BEP panel in Library BDF for the 50-pair copper cable coming from the Laney College tower MDF.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Is the Room Scheduler Panel required for this project? 274116 1.5 N - Provide room scheduling device outside..... 274116 2.2 K - Room scheduling display, ... Confirm finish with architect. 274116 3.3 M.2 - Room Scheduling displays will be provided in the future. Provide cabling to support future system.
Response: The room scheduler is part of the scope. Specification Section 27 41 16, Integrated Audiovisual, will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Acoustical Wall Panel (AWP 1) do not align with the Finish Schedule A9.10 (Misplacement/Missing Call Out). Elevation A5.14/6N room 135 Calls for AWP 1 at East Wall but per the Finish Schedule calls for West Wall, or A5.15/9N #162 Calls for (AWP 1) but the Finish Schedule is missing the call-out. This Occurs throughout the Elevations. Please Confirm we are to follow the Hatch and Call-Out per Elevations due to discrepancies with the finish schedule and void the finish schedule reference due to inconsistencies with the plans.
Response: Use the interior elevations for location and quantity of wall finishes and elements, including Acoustical Wall Panel AWP-1 and Marker Boards.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Atrium Elevation A5.12 shows L2 Atrium South at starting and end point but there are no graphic identifying the elevation break and then continuing on at the mid-section. Please advise whether the graphical void on A5.12/L2 intent is to compact the elevation width span to better fit on the plan sheet.
Response: The void is a graphical break to compact the elevation to fit on the page. The materials are to extend continuously the full width of the south side of the Atrium opening.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 07 42 13 Metal Wall Panels: Sub section 2.6 calls for Stainless Steel soffit panels with a polished finish. Please clarify if and where these occur.
Response: Metal panel soffits are to be aluminum. Specification Section 07 42 13 will be updated to reflect this change in the next upcoming Addenda.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: • Acoustical Wall Panel (AWP 1) do not align with the Finish Schedule A9.10 (Misplacement/Missing Call Out). Elevation A5.14/6N room 135 Calls for AWP 1 at East Wall but per the Finish Schedule calls for West Wall, or A5.15/9N #162 Calls for (AWP 1) but the Finish Schedule is missing the call-out. This Occurs throughout the Elevations. Please Confirm we are to follow the Hatch and Call-Out per Elevations due to discrepancies with the finish schedule and void the finish schedule reference due to inconsistencies with the plans. • Atrium Elevation A5.12 shows L2 Atrium South at starting and end point but there are no graphic identifying the elevation break and then continuing on at the mid-section. Please advise whether the graphical void on A5.12/L2 intent is to compact the elevation width span to better fit on the plan sheet.
Response: 1) See response to Bidder Question 34. 2) See response to Bidder Question 35.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: Div 25 RFIs, Could you please confirm that the Div 25 contractor shall provide 10 submittal packages per 25 0000,1.7, C. Could you please confirm that Div 25 contractor shall provide (40) hours operator training per 25 00 00, 3.15, C.
Response: Confirmed.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Design Suite AV - Should anything be provided for the Design Suite? Sheets T5.24A and T5.24B are showing AV locations however there were no AV parts called out in the 274116 specs. Please clarify.
Response: These are OFOI items.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Wiring diagram for Design Suite - Please provide a wiring diagram for the AV system in the Design Suite.
Response: These are OFOI items.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116- Assistive listening QTY - Please clarify how many total assistive listening systems should be provided for this project. The 274116 specs say to provide " as required." However this number can vary depended on if the client plans to share systems between any rooms. Please clarify if EACH classroom should get their OWN system or will any rooms be sharing the system as needed?
Response: Bidder shall adhere to CBC section 11B-219 when calculating device quantities.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 274116 - Basket Tray and Ladder Racks - What sections are responsible for providing the Basket Tray and Ladder Racks?
Response: General Contractor to determine responsibility.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: 1. What is the terrazzo design mix or selected terrazzo for Stair C? 2. Precast terrazzo landing panels can be cast to a maximum of 20 SF. The two terrazzo landings exceed this. We would like to pour the landings in place to minimize the appearance of grout joints. We would like to include the poured-in-place landings as an alt. Would that be acceptable? 3. In specification section 096623 1.7 B.1 the mockups include the first 3 stair treads. Will the mockups be used in the completed work?
Response: 1) Per Specifications 09 00 00 and 09 66 23, the treads and landings are to be custom size PRECAST EPOXY TERRAZZO. The basis of design is from Wausau Tile or equal, as selected from their standard options. 2) It is acceptable to provide the landings in multiple precast pieces or as a poured-in-place terrazzo system. In either condition, layout to be approved by the architect in shop drawing submittals and sample approval is required to match the cast-in-place landings to the selected pre-cast treads. 3) The stair tread mockups shall be reviewed prior to final installation on the stair, and if approved, can be installed as completed work.
Posted: 1/6/2025
Question: There are aluminum frames that show the detail of 7/A8.53. Some show a sidelite elevation with an SF## type (Storefront?) I am asking because detail 7/A8.53 shows an interior aluminum frame (Spec 081116 – Knock-down wrap-around wall). Since the detail shows a wraparound frame with a trim (not a storefront detail) (See attached clips of the detail), shouldn’t the frame be part of Spec 081116 and not a storefront frame? I ask because the elevation SF## type designates a storefront frame. There are 4 wood doors which have a comment of "Noise Control". The spec 083473 only refers to doors manufactured by Krieger or Noise Barrier or equal. They are both manufacturers of hollow metal sound control and not wood. Please allow us to provide STC doors as manufactured by the same wood door manufacturer we are providing for Spec 081416. Finally regarding STC doors, Opening 285.1 shows a detail of 2/A8.53. This detail is for an aluminum frame. STC doors (Wood or Aluminum) have not been rated or certified for sound control with an aluminum frame. For them to achieve this SC rating a HM frame must be used. Please change the detail to an HM frame. In the remarks column on the door schedule, there is a remark of "G" at a few openings. What does this refer to?
Response: 1) In the documents SF/Storefront refers to multiple glazing systems, both traditional storefront and knock-down interior glazing systems. The drawings use the GS4 and GS5 designation to identify which type to provide. schedule and glazing sheets. 2) Krieger offers STC rated wood veneer doors, for example NC3-WD-STC45 for a wood veneer STC-45 assembly. The required STC for this project is STC-45. The doors, frames and compression sound seal systems are all provided as one tested unit. The acoustical doors and frames are to be as specified in 08 34 73. 3) Details for the acoustical doors are to be 6/A8.41. 4) 'G' is a reference to gasket type 'G' (1/A8.41). 'SG' are Sound Gasketed doors per 5/A8.41 and 'DG' doors are double sound gasketed. Sheet A2.51, Door Schedule and Types, will be updated to reflect these change in the next upcoming Addenda."
Posted: 1/10/2025
Question: The plans calls for an Edwards fire alarm system but the specifications call for a Simplex system. Please advise what is required.
Response: Within Addendum 2, Item ADD 2.007, Specification Section 28 31 11 Digital, Addressable Fire-Alarm System does not state an manufacturer and Item ADD 2.015, Sheet FA.00 - Fire Alarm General Notes and Legend notes an Edwards system. Provide Edwards per Schedule on Sheet FA.00.
Posted: 1/14/2025
Question: Our firm is supported by Markel Surety. A top 15 surety company based on annual gross written premium, as reported by The Surety & Fidelity Association. They provide surety performance and payment bonds for us. Based on their experience, they advise that certain surety provisions in the proposed contract documents unduly increase the risk to the surety and us as contractor and could limit the availability of bonds, despite our strong capabilities and credit quality. First, Section 24 of the General Conditions requires a surety response within an unrealistically short time frame. In particular, 24.2.2 states in part: 24.2.2.1 Upon the occurrence at District's sole determination of any of the above conditions, District may, without prejudice to any other right or remedy, serve written notice upon Contractor and its Surety of District's termination of this Contract and/or the Contractor’s right to perform the work of the Contract. This notice will contain the reasons for termination. Unless, within three (3) days after the service of the notice, any and all condition(s) shall cease, and any and all violation(s) shall cease, or arrangement satisfactory to District for the correction of the condition(s) and/or violation(s) be made, this Contract and/or the Contractor’s right to perform the Work of the Contract shall cease and terminate. Upon termination, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the entire Work is finished. 24.2.2.2 Upon Termination, District may immediately serve written notice of tender upon Surety whereby Surety shall have the right to take over and perform this Contract only if Surety: 24.2.2.2.1 Within three (3) days after service upon it of the notice of tender, gives District written notice of Surety’s intention to take over and perform this Contract; and 24.2.2.2.2 Commences performance of this Contract within three (3) days from date of serving of its notice to District. Particularly considering the size of this project, three days is not an adequate amount of time to provide a meaningful response. A performance bond claim can be quite complex with a multitude of facts and the competing interests of the contractor and obligee in play. A surety generally conducts an investigation to assess the default, including the positions of all the parties of the bond, and makes a determination how best to proceed. Further, if a default has occurred and the surety must complete the contract, it must select a qualified contractor who can complete the project efficiently and economically. The investigation of a claim and the ultimate selection of a completing contractor take time. Although all parties' interests are served when the surety responds promptly and in a timely manner, three days is an insufficient amount of time to resolve the claim adequately. We recommend that the time to respond be extended to 30 days. Second, 24.2.2.2 of the General Conditions and the proposed bond form seem to limit the surety’s remedy upon termination to simply taking over the work. Sureties typically have multiple options in remedying a default: take over the project, tender a completion contractor to the obligee or make a financial settlement with the obligee. A surety carefully considers these options and remedies the default in a way that is most appropriate based on the facts of a particular case and dialogue with the contractor and obligee. A takeover may not be the appropriate remedy in a given case. In such a case, claims costs may be higher than necessary for the surety and ultimately for the contractor. We suggest that this provision and the bond form should be revised to clearly provide the surety the necessary flexibility in remedying a default. Third, the bond form states, “Surety expressly agrees that the District may reject any contractor or subcontractor proposed by Surety to fulfill its obligations in the event of default by the Principal.” As you know, obtaining a completion contractor in this market is very difficult. We have found that if the surety’s options are restricted, the completion costs can escalate significantly. In the interest of controlling completions costs and making more of the contract balance available for completion, selection of a completion contractor should be the surety’s decision. At the very least, the selection should be predicated on the District’s consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Fourth, based on the language in the performance bond, the surety’s obligation to obtain bids for a completion contractor is not explicitly conditioned on “event of default”. The paragraph simply begins with, “at the District’s sole discretion and election,”. The underwriting and pricing of a surety bond contemplate that the surety’s obligation is conditioned on a default of the contract. Although it may not have been the intention of the District to require a bond without such condition, we recommend explicitly adding the default of the contractor as a trigger to the surety’s obligations under the bond. Fifth, the performance bond sets forth certain events that shall not affect the surety's obligations under the bond. In particular, the form states, “The Surety also stipulates and agrees that it shall not be exonerated or released from the obligation of this bond by any overpayment or underpayment by the District that is based upon estimates approved by the Architect.” If the owner pays for work not performed, thereby reducing the contract balance available to complete the work, the excess cost to complete over the remaining contract is increased, to the detriment of the surety. In underwriting the risk, the surety contemplates that contract funds will be available to complete the work in the event it must step in and take over the project. Under this bond provision, the owner conceivably could pay the contractor 100% of the contract on the first day of the project (contrary to the terms and conditions of the contract) and still expect the surety to complete the work in the event of a default. We recommend that this provision should be deleted. At least it should reflect the common law applicable to such a case, which is that the surety is discharged to the extent that it is prejudiced by the overpayment. Sixth, we request clarification with respect to the following sentence in the bond form: “Nothing herein shall limit the District’s rights or the Contractor or Surety’s obligations under the Contract, law or equity, including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15.” Section 337.15 is a limitation period (statute of repose) limiting the time to bring a suit, particularly for a latent defect. This section does not really establish a right of the District or an obligation of the contractor or surety. Surety provisions in bond forms and contract documents that increase the surety's and contractor’s risk ultimately are harmful for competition. A surety addresses increased risk by tightening its underwriting thresholds, thereby restricting competition for the project. In addition, a contractor that will submit a bid may price the increased risk accordingly. The increased costs from the use of the Performance Bond outweigh any benefits to the District. We ask that the District consider revisions to the forms that will present a more reasonable risk for the surety. We would be happy to work with the District in suggesting revised language. Thank you for your consideration.
Response: After review with District's General Counsel, the District will keep both the existing contract and the performance bond language as is.
Posted: 1/16/2025
Question: Are there any submission requirements for a site security subcontractor? We have already sent company info and SLEB docs to all GCCs.
Response: Bidders will include subcontractor information as per Document 00 45 46.13, SLBE & SELBE Program. See response to Bidder Question 30.2.