Arlington County Government Sealed Solicitation

Title: 21-DPR-ITB-639 Towers Park Playground Renovations

Deadline: 7/8/2021 1:00 PM   (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Status: Awarded

Solicitation Number: 21-DPR-ITB-639

Description: Arlington County is seeking a qualified Contract to provide all material, labor and resources for the park renovation at Towers Park, located at 801 South Scott Street, Arlington, VA 22204

Documents:

Documents as of 6/2/2021
21-DPR-ITB-639 Towers Park Playground Renovations - Final.pdf
21-DPR-ITB-639 Bid Submittal.pdf
Addition 1

Posted: 6/21/2021

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1

Overview: Addendum No.1 revises Attachment A & Attachment B, changes bid due date, and answers vendor inquiries.

Deadline: 7/8/2021 1:00 PM

Solicitation #: 21-DPR-ITB-639

Documents:

Addition 2

Posted: 6/24/2021

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 2

Overview: Addendum No. 2 states the approved equivalent

Documents:

Addition 3

Posted: 7/8/2021

Type of Addition: In Review

Overview: Bid Tabulation

Documents:

Addition 4

Posted: 9/22/2021

Type of Addition: Award Information

Overview: Notice of Award to - PIVOT Construction LLC

Documents:

Question 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing LF01-03 do not show any permanent root aeration mating. Please confirm that's correct.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 2

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing LF-03 shows some hatching mark within the CRZ nearby the new stair, which is not identified on the legend. Please clarify what's that hatching mark.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 3

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing C09A shows a wall shaped like a letter "D" backward nearby the existing picnic shelter. Is that wall concrete or modular retaining wall?

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 4

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing REF-01 shows a table with the quantities of plants. At the bottom of that table, there is a verbiage about the minimum reforestation planting requirements. Please clarify which is the correct information to follow.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 5

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Detail 5/L04 indicates the steel edging which appears to be at 12-14" deep with the dimension shown. The spec section 329300 states as 5" deep. Which is correct?

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 6

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Spec section 329300, part 2.5 indicates the Temporary Plant Protection Fence according to Detail 5 on Contract Drawing Sheet LP3. Please provide the drawing sheet LP3.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 7

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Per sheet C19 the EWF will perform with a stone storage reservoir beneath; this appears to apply to all areas with EWF. Detail 2/L02 shows a typical detail with no reservoir. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 8

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet C5 profile STM-10 to STM-5 appears to show a reservoir of stone that is several feet deep below the EWF. Sheet C09B section AA appears to show a consist depth reservoir. Please clarify the reservoir depth.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 9

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet C09B section AA appears to show stone reservoir beneath PIP surfacing. The PIP details on L02 do not appear to show a reservoir underneath the PIP. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 10

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Detail 9/L02 appears to show a PIP turndown within a play equipment footer. The footer fully encases the turn down above and below. Please clarify the intent.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 11

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet LF03 calls out permanent aeration matting but the hatch is not used. Please confirm the intent is for the hatched area beneath the stairs.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 12

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: 1/L02 appears to show curbs at the front of all sidewalk along EWF. The plans do not reflect this. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Question 13

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: The PIP specifications state that there should be absolutely no recycled material in the wearing course, but the color specified in the drawings call for 15% Black. It is uncommon to call for virgin (non-recycled) Black material. Please confirm you'd like non-recycled black material.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/21/2021

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1

Overview: Addendum No.1 revises Attachment A & Attachment B, changes bid due date, and answers vendor inquiries.

Deadline: 7/8/2021 1:00 PM

Solicitation #: 21-DPR-ITB-639

Documents:

Posted: 6/24/2021

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 2

Overview: Addendum No. 2 states the approved equivalent

Documents:

Posted: 7/8/2021

Type of Addition: In Review

Overview: Bid Tabulation

Documents:

Posted: 9/22/2021

Type of Addition: Award Information

Overview: Notice of Award to - PIVOT Construction LLC

Documents:

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing LF01-03 do not show any permanent root aeration mating. Please confirm that's correct.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing LF-03 shows some hatching mark within the CRZ nearby the new stair, which is not identified on the legend. Please clarify what's that hatching mark.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing C09A shows a wall shaped like a letter "D" backward nearby the existing picnic shelter. Is that wall concrete or modular retaining wall?

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Drawing REF-01 shows a table with the quantities of plants. At the bottom of that table, there is a verbiage about the minimum reforestation planting requirements. Please clarify which is the correct information to follow.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Detail 5/L04 indicates the steel edging which appears to be at 12-14" deep with the dimension shown. The spec section 329300 states as 5" deep. Which is correct?

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Spec section 329300, part 2.5 indicates the Temporary Plant Protection Fence according to Detail 5 on Contract Drawing Sheet LP3. Please provide the drawing sheet LP3.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Per sheet C19 the EWF will perform with a stone storage reservoir beneath; this appears to apply to all areas with EWF. Detail 2/L02 shows a typical detail with no reservoir. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet C5 profile STM-10 to STM-5 appears to show a reservoir of stone that is several feet deep below the EWF. Sheet C09B section AA appears to show a consist depth reservoir. Please clarify the reservoir depth.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet C09B section AA appears to show stone reservoir beneath PIP surfacing. The PIP details on L02 do not appear to show a reservoir underneath the PIP. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Detail 9/L02 appears to show a PIP turndown within a play equipment footer. The footer fully encases the turn down above and below. Please clarify the intent.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: Sheet LF03 calls out permanent aeration matting but the hatch is not used. Please confirm the intent is for the hatched area beneath the stairs.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: 1/L02 appears to show curbs at the front of all sidewalk along EWF. The plans do not reflect this. Please clarify.

Response: See Addendum No. 1

Posted: 6/11/2021

Question: The PIP specifications state that there should be absolutely no recycled material in the wearing course, but the color specified in the drawings call for 15% Black. It is uncommon to call for virgin (non-recycled) Black material. Please confirm you'd like non-recycled black material.

Response: See Addendum No. 1