Rio Rancho Public Schools Sealed Solicitation

Title: STUDENT SUPPORT CENTER RENOVATIONS

Deadline: 9/18/2020 2:00 PM   (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)

Status: Deadline Expired

Solicitation Number: RFP No. 2021-001-FAC

Description:

Work of this Contract covers the following construction at 481 NM528 (Pat D’Arco) in Rio Rancho, New Mexico.  Renovation of approximately 8,200 s.f. existing vacant stand-alone building and addition of approximately 420 s.f.  The scope of work includes, but is not limited to, the following as identified on the Contract Documents:

  • ·         Demolition of existing interior walls and selective exterior walls, doors and storefronts, HVAC, plumbing and electrical systems.

  • ·         Expansion of building footprint in selected areas under existing roof structure overhang along with associated concrete slab and footing and new exterior finish system.

  • ·         New load-bearing structural steel beams and columns.

  • ·         New interior framed partitions in selected areas.

  • ·         Demolition of existing roofing system and new replacement roofing system.

  • ·         Interior doors, frames, millwork, plumbing HVAC, electrical and special systems.

  • ·         New floor, wall and ceiling finishes.

Some interior walls, doors and millwork items will be provided and installed by Owner’s vendor for DIRTT Construction System.  General Contractor will be responsible for all coordination, sequencing and preparation as required for DIRTT System items.

Sitework will include refurbishing, striping and minor associated work related to the eastern section of the existing parking lot and a new trash enclosure.

This project does not require LEED certification.  References to LEED throughout this RFP are not applicable to this project.

 











Pre-Bid Meeting Date: 9/10/2020 10:00 AM

Pre-Bid Meeting Details: Please sign up if you plan to attend the pre-bid meeting.LOCATION: Student Support Center 481 NM528 (Pat D-Arco) Rio Rancho, NM


Documents:

Documents as of 8/28/2020
Login to view documents
Login to view documents
Login to view documents
Addition 1

Posted: 9/4/2020

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1

Documents:

Addition 2

Posted: 9/9/2020

Type of Addition: Addendum

Documents:

Question 1

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: Good Morning, Would you please tell me how to submit a light fixture package for prior approval. I sent to Architect but was told to submit through this site. Thank you

Response: See Addendum

Question 2

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: In questions 3.a of both the General Contractor Qualification Statement and the Subcontractor Qualification Statement, the question reads, “Has your firm completed one (1) or more educational facility, addition and/or renovation project(s) of similar complexity totaling 30,000 square feet or more since 2010, as the proposed project?” Since the RRPS project will involve no more than 9,000 SF, could the square footage for this requirement be reduced?

Response: See Addendum

Question 3

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: In questions 4.a(3) and 4.b(3) of the General Contractor Qualification Statement, the questions ask if the personnel have experience with projects totaling 30,000 square feet or more. Since the RRPS project will involve no more than 9,000 SF, could the square footage for this requirement be reduced?

Response: See Addendum

Question 4

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: GWSS is seeking Approval for the following manufactures: The spec for security access calls out Vanderbilt or approved equal. We would like to submit approval for Open Options Access Control, this product meets and exceeds the spec requirements. The second system is for Intrusion, The spec does not list a manufacture, We would like to submit approval for Bosch Intrusion panels, this product meets and exceeds the spec requirements. The Third system is Fire Alarm, The spec lists Notifier, Simplex or Edwards. We would like to submit for Siemens Cerberus Pro Fire Alarm Panels, This product meets and exceeds the spec.

Response: See Addendum

Question 5

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 1. Construction duration note 1 on sheet G-005 calls for project duration to be 95 calendar days. With amount of scope at coordination with DIRRT wall system durations seems to short to achieve. Is it possible to extend project duration?

Response: See Addendum

Question 6

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 2. Assuming notice of award on October 6th and 95 calendar day construction duration we will not be able to reseed disturbed areas upon completion due to winter weather. Is it acceptable to reseed spring 2021?

Response: See Addendum

Question 7

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 3. Sheet AS-101 detail 2 calls for 8’ tall x ¼” plate welded to gate frame. Is it the intention to build the gate 6’ tall to match the CMU height? Also is hatching showing steel plate slats welded to the frame with a gap between each piece?

Response: See Addendum

Question 8

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 4. Sheet A-101 keyed note 11 shows 2 4”x4” columns in DIRTT walls. Will the DIRTT wall system allow this and if so is thickness of DIRTT frame enough to conceal column in wall system?

Response: See Addendum

Question 9

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 5. Will zone boxes be required for DIRTT wall power supply? If so please provide layout and cut sheets for required zone boxes. Will zone boxes be supplied by DIRTT and installed by contractor?

Response: See Addendum

Question 10

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 6. Will the overhead support/seismic bracing for the DIRTT walls be provided and installed by DIRTT?

Response: See Addendum

Question 11

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 7. Will background checks through RRPS be required for all onsite workers?

Response: See Addendum

Question 12

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 8. Contractor is providing and installing door hardware on DIRTT wall doors. Will DIRTT wall contractor prep their door to receive the hardware or will door have to be prepped in the field?

Response: See Addendum

Question 13

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 9. Page 00 1119-29 of the project manual part B states that the technical proposal shall consist of 60 points and the price proposal shall consist of 40 points, but the break down below section B shows the technical proposal totaling 40 points and the price proposal totaling 60 points. Which is correct?

Response: See Addendum

Question 14

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 10. The accessories schedule on sheet A-601 calls for 3 electric hand dryers. The restroom floor plans and electrical power plan does not call out the electric hand dryers. Are we to install electric hand dryers or just paper towel dispensers?

Response: See Addendum

Question 15

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 11. Are sanitary napkin dispensers required in the women’s restroom? If so please provide make and model.

Response: See Addendum

Question 16

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: Per sheet G-005 under owner's scope of work all special systems wiring and equipment are listed to be under a separate contract, however the electrical drawings show the special systems to be included in the project. Please advise.

Response: See Addendum

Question 17

Posted: 9/10/2020

Question: Have the SAS plumbing lines been verified or do as builts exist for them? Plans call out for new domestic water, hot water, and SAS (if existing is >4"). Replacing the SAS system will require significant concrete removal and replacement if required; and would result in a drastic price difference compared to if the old line is reusable.

Response: Answer to RFI #17 on Vendor Registry: Use the as-built/as designed drawings for design; however the system has not been verified.

Question 18

Posted: 9/10/2020

Question: Please confirm mgomez@jbhenderson.com is listed for notifications. We received addenda #1 notification, but not #2. I have just found and downloaded now.

Response:

Question 19

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Can Tab 9 - Separate Prices Break-Out Form be excluded from the page count limit of 30 pages for the Technical Proposal?

Response: See Addendum

Question 20

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: For the General Contractor Statement of Qualifications, you have reduced the size requirement for past experience to 15,000 SF. Can you also make this change for the Subcontractor Statement of Qualifications?

Response: See Addendum

Question 21

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: On the GC Statement of Qualifications, you have reduced the experience requirement size to 15,000 SF for the Project Manager. Does that change also apply to the Superintendent?

Response: See Addendum

Question 22

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: For the Subcontractor Qualification Statement, under 4.3(b), can the size requirement for the Superintendent/Foreman's past experience be reduced from 30,000 SF to 15,000 SF?

Response: See Addendum

Question 23

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Specifications Section 270528 PATHWAYS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS Part 1, 1.2, A. "Furnish and install a complete telephone/data system, including cabinets, conduit, outlet boxes, jacks, cabling and device plates, as shown on the drawings" Part 3, 3.1 "TELEPHONE CABLE: Install 4-pair, Category 6, 23 gauge, solid plenum rated cable from each telephone jack to terminal board and terminate on punch down blocks" 3.3 "DATA CABLE: Install 4-pair, Category 6/6A/6E plenum rated 23 gauge. Terminate per TIA-586a from each data jack to the terminal board and terminate on data cross connect blocks" Sheet E-301 General Notes "D- Install all network Equipment per Rio Rancho Public Schools It Department Standards and Direction, cable will be installed by others" Please Clarify if the intent is to be Rough In Only including all conduit, boxes, mud rings as indicated on drawings and all cabling is to be provided by Owner/Vendor (Not listed on Special Systems Responsibility Matrix per addendum #2)? Please Clarify "NETWORK EQUIPMENT" stated on Sheet E-301? Is this to include Switches/WAPS/patch cords/UPS units? If this is the intent please provide a complete parts list including Manufacturer Name, Part#s.

Response: Answer to RFI #23 on Vendor Registry: There is no cabling required for the telephone/data system. The GC shall provide and install boxes, conduit, cover plates, and data jacks.

Question 24

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet E-301 Keyed Note 15 indicates New Intercom System to be provided and installed by Sound & Signal. Clarify this is the intent of Rio Rancho Public Schools? Clarify if this is to be included as costs in the General Contractor Pricing or Owner/Vendor? Clarify if any required rough in by Electrical Contractor is to be provided in support of this system as none is indicated with exception of Circuit A-11 for Head End Equipment?

Response: See Addendum

Question 25

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 1. Please clarify if existing floors and ceilings are to be demoed throughout. 2. Please clarify what sub quals are required. Listing form calls for concrete and masonry but those scopes are minimal. 3. Please provide an interior signage schedule

Response: See Addendum

Question 26

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 1. From Roofing Sub Contractor: At walk thru this morning, it was noted that the existing deck is 7/16” OSB (Visible at roof hatch) Specs call for mechanically Attached roof system via Rhinobond, with 90 MPH wind speed warranty, Existing OSB decking will not achieve the required fastener pull out value, to achieve FM 1-75 insulation Fastening requirements! Recommendation, install ½ plywood over existing OSB decking, if existing trusses are rated for the additional weight.

Response: Answer to RFI #26 on Vendor Registry: There is a ½” high density coverboard over existing decking called out on the Roof Plan A-131 sheet as well as on the roof details on sheet A-501 to achieve the fastener pull out value and insulation requirements.

Question 27

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 2. In specification section 00 1119-25 under TAB 4-Past Performance, it is stating that the GC has to have worked with DIRTT on at least one project within the past 5 projects. Is this a requirement that will disqualify a GC if there is no past experience working with DIRTT? At the pre bid meeting, it was mentioned that a 2 hour training seminar is required for the awarded GC that have not worked with DIRTT in the past. Please clarify this requirement.

Response: See Addendum

Question 28

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 3. Will this project be handled by the Bid Depository? Concern is these prices are not posted until 11am the day of the bid by the Bid Depository, not leaving adequate time to complete the sub qualifications based requirements outlined for the Technical Proposal.

Response: Answer to RFI #28 on Vendor Registry: The project will not be handled by the Bid Depository.

Question 29

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Is it possible to submit the sub qualifications packets the following business day? So, V1 and V2 submitted on 9/18/20 and the Sub Qualifications submitted 9/21/20?

Response: See Addendum

Question 30

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Keyed note 33 on sheet AD-101 calls to check existing roof deck insulation for R-38 value. It also states that the insulation is to be FSK due to the open return plenum. The existing insulation is not FSK but the mechanical drawings show a fully ducted return system. Is the roof deck insulation required to be FSK-25?

Response: See Addendum

Question 31

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet AD-101 keyed note 24 calls for window unit to be removed and relocated. The center windows unit on the north side has a rock chip in the glass. Is new glass to provided for this window unit?

Response: See Addendum

Question 32

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet AD-101 keyed note 26 calls for window unit to remain. The window unit on the north east corner of the building is cracked. Is new glass to be provided for this window unit?

Response: See Addendum

Question 33

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Existing curb in parking lot is damaged in multiple areas. Are these areas of curb to be replaced?

Response: See Addendum

Question 34

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Keyed note 24 on sheet A-401 calls for full height wall tiles at all walls, but the elevations only show the wet walls. Is it the intent to tile all of the restrooms walls or just the restroom wet walls?

Response: See Addendum

Question 35

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Will MC cable be allowed for branch circuits and lighting? Home Runs will be ¾” EMT.

Response: Answer to RFI #35 on Vendor Registry: MC Cable is permitted from J-boxes to lighting. Conduit shall be routed to all DIRTT wall power boxes.

Question 36

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Please confirm if a HVAC BACnet system is going to be installed in this project, drawings do not show BACnet/BAS workstation location but spec section 251000 outlines BACnet/BAS. If workstation is not part of the scope will system be controlled differently? Is spec section 251000 applicable?

Response: See Addendum

Question 37

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: RFP tab 6 - management plan subpart d, asks us to address protocol to support optimization of sustainability principles and achievement of LEED certification. Being that this is not a LEED project is this section of the management plan required?

Response: Answer to RFI #37 on Vendor Registry: This project does not require LEED certification, therefore the management plan does not need to address protocols to support achievement of LEED certification.

Question 38

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Missed substitution cutoff after the prebid meeting. Are there alternatives to the 3 Fire Alarm cut sheet options you included with Addendum 2? Edwards EST? Silent Knight?

Response: See Addendum

Question 39

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: This is a test

Response:

Posted: 9/4/2020

Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1

Documents:

Posted: 9/9/2020

Type of Addition: Addendum

Documents:

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: Good Morning, Would you please tell me how to submit a light fixture package for prior approval. I sent to Architect but was told to submit through this site. Thank you

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: In questions 3.a of both the General Contractor Qualification Statement and the Subcontractor Qualification Statement, the question reads, “Has your firm completed one (1) or more educational facility, addition and/or renovation project(s) of similar complexity totaling 30,000 square feet or more since 2010, as the proposed project?” Since the RRPS project will involve no more than 9,000 SF, could the square footage for this requirement be reduced?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/3/2020

Question: In questions 4.a(3) and 4.b(3) of the General Contractor Qualification Statement, the questions ask if the personnel have experience with projects totaling 30,000 square feet or more. Since the RRPS project will involve no more than 9,000 SF, could the square footage for this requirement be reduced?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: GWSS is seeking Approval for the following manufactures: The spec for security access calls out Vanderbilt or approved equal. We would like to submit approval for Open Options Access Control, this product meets and exceeds the spec requirements. The second system is for Intrusion, The spec does not list a manufacture, We would like to submit approval for Bosch Intrusion panels, this product meets and exceeds the spec requirements. The Third system is Fire Alarm, The spec lists Notifier, Simplex or Edwards. We would like to submit for Siemens Cerberus Pro Fire Alarm Panels, This product meets and exceeds the spec.

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 1. Construction duration note 1 on sheet G-005 calls for project duration to be 95 calendar days. With amount of scope at coordination with DIRRT wall system durations seems to short to achieve. Is it possible to extend project duration?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 2. Assuming notice of award on October 6th and 95 calendar day construction duration we will not be able to reseed disturbed areas upon completion due to winter weather. Is it acceptable to reseed spring 2021?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 3. Sheet AS-101 detail 2 calls for 8’ tall x ¼” plate welded to gate frame. Is it the intention to build the gate 6’ tall to match the CMU height? Also is hatching showing steel plate slats welded to the frame with a gap between each piece?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 4. Sheet A-101 keyed note 11 shows 2 4”x4” columns in DIRTT walls. Will the DIRTT wall system allow this and if so is thickness of DIRTT frame enough to conceal column in wall system?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 5. Will zone boxes be required for DIRTT wall power supply? If so please provide layout and cut sheets for required zone boxes. Will zone boxes be supplied by DIRTT and installed by contractor?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 6. Will the overhead support/seismic bracing for the DIRTT walls be provided and installed by DIRTT?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 7. Will background checks through RRPS be required for all onsite workers?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 8. Contractor is providing and installing door hardware on DIRTT wall doors. Will DIRTT wall contractor prep their door to receive the hardware or will door have to be prepped in the field?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 9. Page 00 1119-29 of the project manual part B states that the technical proposal shall consist of 60 points and the price proposal shall consist of 40 points, but the break down below section B shows the technical proposal totaling 40 points and the price proposal totaling 60 points. Which is correct?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 10. The accessories schedule on sheet A-601 calls for 3 electric hand dryers. The restroom floor plans and electrical power plan does not call out the electric hand dryers. Are we to install electric hand dryers or just paper towel dispensers?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: 11. Are sanitary napkin dispensers required in the women’s restroom? If so please provide make and model.

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/9/2020

Question: Per sheet G-005 under owner's scope of work all special systems wiring and equipment are listed to be under a separate contract, however the electrical drawings show the special systems to be included in the project. Please advise.

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/10/2020

Question: Have the SAS plumbing lines been verified or do as builts exist for them? Plans call out for new domestic water, hot water, and SAS (if existing is >4"). Replacing the SAS system will require significant concrete removal and replacement if required; and would result in a drastic price difference compared to if the old line is reusable.

Response: Answer to RFI #17 on Vendor Registry: Use the as-built/as designed drawings for design; however the system has not been verified.

Posted: 9/10/2020

Question: Please confirm mgomez@jbhenderson.com is listed for notifications. We received addenda #1 notification, but not #2. I have just found and downloaded now.

Response:

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Can Tab 9 - Separate Prices Break-Out Form be excluded from the page count limit of 30 pages for the Technical Proposal?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: For the General Contractor Statement of Qualifications, you have reduced the size requirement for past experience to 15,000 SF. Can you also make this change for the Subcontractor Statement of Qualifications?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: On the GC Statement of Qualifications, you have reduced the experience requirement size to 15,000 SF for the Project Manager. Does that change also apply to the Superintendent?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: For the Subcontractor Qualification Statement, under 4.3(b), can the size requirement for the Superintendent/Foreman's past experience be reduced from 30,000 SF to 15,000 SF?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Specifications Section 270528 PATHWAYS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS Part 1, 1.2, A. "Furnish and install a complete telephone/data system, including cabinets, conduit, outlet boxes, jacks, cabling and device plates, as shown on the drawings" Part 3, 3.1 "TELEPHONE CABLE: Install 4-pair, Category 6, 23 gauge, solid plenum rated cable from each telephone jack to terminal board and terminate on punch down blocks" 3.3 "DATA CABLE: Install 4-pair, Category 6/6A/6E plenum rated 23 gauge. Terminate per TIA-586a from each data jack to the terminal board and terminate on data cross connect blocks" Sheet E-301 General Notes "D- Install all network Equipment per Rio Rancho Public Schools It Department Standards and Direction, cable will be installed by others" Please Clarify if the intent is to be Rough In Only including all conduit, boxes, mud rings as indicated on drawings and all cabling is to be provided by Owner/Vendor (Not listed on Special Systems Responsibility Matrix per addendum #2)? Please Clarify "NETWORK EQUIPMENT" stated on Sheet E-301? Is this to include Switches/WAPS/patch cords/UPS units? If this is the intent please provide a complete parts list including Manufacturer Name, Part#s.

Response: Answer to RFI #23 on Vendor Registry: There is no cabling required for the telephone/data system. The GC shall provide and install boxes, conduit, cover plates, and data jacks.

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet E-301 Keyed Note 15 indicates New Intercom System to be provided and installed by Sound & Signal. Clarify this is the intent of Rio Rancho Public Schools? Clarify if this is to be included as costs in the General Contractor Pricing or Owner/Vendor? Clarify if any required rough in by Electrical Contractor is to be provided in support of this system as none is indicated with exception of Circuit A-11 for Head End Equipment?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 1. Please clarify if existing floors and ceilings are to be demoed throughout. 2. Please clarify what sub quals are required. Listing form calls for concrete and masonry but those scopes are minimal. 3. Please provide an interior signage schedule

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 1. From Roofing Sub Contractor: At walk thru this morning, it was noted that the existing deck is 7/16” OSB (Visible at roof hatch) Specs call for mechanically Attached roof system via Rhinobond, with 90 MPH wind speed warranty, Existing OSB decking will not achieve the required fastener pull out value, to achieve FM 1-75 insulation Fastening requirements! Recommendation, install ½ plywood over existing OSB decking, if existing trusses are rated for the additional weight.

Response: Answer to RFI #26 on Vendor Registry: There is a ½” high density coverboard over existing decking called out on the Roof Plan A-131 sheet as well as on the roof details on sheet A-501 to achieve the fastener pull out value and insulation requirements.

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 2. In specification section 00 1119-25 under TAB 4-Past Performance, it is stating that the GC has to have worked with DIRTT on at least one project within the past 5 projects. Is this a requirement that will disqualify a GC if there is no past experience working with DIRTT? At the pre bid meeting, it was mentioned that a 2 hour training seminar is required for the awarded GC that have not worked with DIRTT in the past. Please clarify this requirement.

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: 3. Will this project be handled by the Bid Depository? Concern is these prices are not posted until 11am the day of the bid by the Bid Depository, not leaving adequate time to complete the sub qualifications based requirements outlined for the Technical Proposal.

Response: Answer to RFI #28 on Vendor Registry: The project will not be handled by the Bid Depository.

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Is it possible to submit the sub qualifications packets the following business day? So, V1 and V2 submitted on 9/18/20 and the Sub Qualifications submitted 9/21/20?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Keyed note 33 on sheet AD-101 calls to check existing roof deck insulation for R-38 value. It also states that the insulation is to be FSK due to the open return plenum. The existing insulation is not FSK but the mechanical drawings show a fully ducted return system. Is the roof deck insulation required to be FSK-25?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet AD-101 keyed note 24 calls for window unit to be removed and relocated. The center windows unit on the north side has a rock chip in the glass. Is new glass to provided for this window unit?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Sheet AD-101 keyed note 26 calls for window unit to remain. The window unit on the north east corner of the building is cracked. Is new glass to be provided for this window unit?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Existing curb in parking lot is damaged in multiple areas. Are these areas of curb to be replaced?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Keyed note 24 on sheet A-401 calls for full height wall tiles at all walls, but the elevations only show the wet walls. Is it the intent to tile all of the restrooms walls or just the restroom wet walls?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Will MC cable be allowed for branch circuits and lighting? Home Runs will be ¾” EMT.

Response: Answer to RFI #35 on Vendor Registry: MC Cable is permitted from J-boxes to lighting. Conduit shall be routed to all DIRTT wall power boxes.

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Please confirm if a HVAC BACnet system is going to be installed in this project, drawings do not show BACnet/BAS workstation location but spec section 251000 outlines BACnet/BAS. If workstation is not part of the scope will system be controlled differently? Is spec section 251000 applicable?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: RFP tab 6 - management plan subpart d, asks us to address protocol to support optimization of sustainability principles and achievement of LEED certification. Being that this is not a LEED project is this section of the management plan required?

Response: Answer to RFI #37 on Vendor Registry: This project does not require LEED certification, therefore the management plan does not need to address protocols to support achievement of LEED certification.

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: Missed substitution cutoff after the prebid meeting. Are there alternatives to the 3 Fire Alarm cut sheet options you included with Addendum 2? Edwards EST? Silent Knight?

Response: See Addendum

Posted: 9/11/2020

Question: This is a test

Response: