City of Woodstock Sealed Solicitation
Title: RFQ 2022 - 18 - I-575 at Ridgewalk Pkwy Improvements Project
Deadline: 6/22/2022 10:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Status: Deadline Expired
Solicitation Number: 2022 - 18
Description: The City of Woodstock Local Administered Projects Program is soliciting Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified firm(s) or organization(s) to provide consultant services for PI 001617 I-575 at the Ridgewalk Parkway Interchange and Traffic Operational Improvements Project.
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services for the project/contract listed in Exhibit I. Firms that respond to this RFQ and are determined by the City of Woodstock of Woodstock to be sufficiently qualified, may be deemed eligible, and invited to offer a technical approach and/or possibly present and/or interview for these services. All respondents to this RFQ are subject to instructions communicated in this document and are cautioned to completely review the entire RFQ and follow instructions carefully. The City of Woodstock reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications or Technical Approach, and to waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of City of Woodstock.
Documents:
| Documents as of 4/29/2022 |
|---|
| Login to view documents |
PLANHOLDERS:
| Date | Company Name |
|---|---|
| 4/29/2022 5:23:02 PM | Ohmshiv constructions LLC |
| 5/2/2022 5:31:41 AM | Dodge Data |
| 5/2/2022 7:44:19 AM | Prime Engineering, Inc. |
| 5/2/2022 8:19:18 AM | Toole Design Group, LLC |
| 5/2/2022 8:56:31 AM | Sovereigns Engineering & Surveying Holdings Inc |
| 5/2/2022 9:59:54 AM | Veith Traffic Services LLC |
| 5/2/2022 10:10:01 AM | Wiedeman and Singleton, Inc. |
| 5/2/2022 5:49:04 PM | Accrete Construction Company |
| 5/3/2022 1:48:42 PM | C & S Contracting Co LLC |
| 5/4/2022 4:37:37 PM | Sol Construction |
| 5/5/2022 10:37:58 AM | T.Y. Lin International |
| 5/7/2022 1:22:28 PM | Bid Prime |
| 5/9/2022 7:14:56 AM | Stewart Bros., Inc. |
| 5/10/2022 9:16:31 AM | Practical Design Partners |
| 5/11/2022 11:13:56 AM | Pond & Company |
| 5/19/2022 10:08:54 AM | R&B Developer, Inc |
| 5/19/2022 3:21:03 PM | Yellowstone Landscape |
| 5/20/2022 9:32:54 AM | Astra Group Inc. |
| 5/23/2022 1:19:07 PM | Proshot Concrete, Inc. |
| 5/26/2022 3:03:01 PM | Croy Engineering, LLC |
| 5/26/2022 3:04:23 PM | BCC Engineering, LLC d/b/a Heath & Lineback |
| 5/26/2022 3:14:44 PM | Keck & Wood, Inc. |
| 5/26/2022 3:16:38 PM | Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering, PLLC |
| 5/26/2022 3:19:27 PM | Volkert, Inc. |
| 5/26/2022 3:45:14 PM | Robinson Transportation Consultants, LLC |
| 5/26/2022 3:54:04 PM | Arcadis |
| 5/26/2022 4:56:14 PM | Construction Journal |
| 5/26/2022 5:04:49 PM | Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP |
| 5/27/2022 7:08:08 AM | dodge data and analytics |
| 5/27/2022 8:21:53 AM | KCI Technologies, Inc. |
| 5/27/2022 12:14:09 PM | Michael Baker International, Inc. |
| 5/31/2022 12:34:12 PM | Kimley-Horn |
| 6/20/2022 12:57:15 PM | Atlas Technical Consultants LLC |
| 6/20/2022 4:06:36 PM | Arcadis |
| 6/21/2022 12:07:56 AM | AG Ltd |
| 6/21/2022 3:05:03 AM | IMS |
| 7/28/2022 11:45:37 AM | DAF Concrete, Inc. |
Addition 1
Posted: 5/26/2022
Type of Addition: Addendum 1 - Questions, Draft Contract, & Zoom Link
Overview: Zoom Link
Deadline: 5/31/2022 10:00 AM
Solicitation #: 2022 - 18
Documents:
Question 1
Posted: 5/3/2022
Question: On pp. 15 & 16 of the RFQ, in the list of area classes, you show "3.14 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians." The correct number for this area class is 3.13; 3.14 is Historic Rehabilitation. Is 3.13 the area class you meant to show? Thanks.
Response: Yes, use 3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians
Question 2
Posted: 5/10/2022
Question: Good afternoon, Please see below questions concerning RFQ 2022-18. 1. Are additional Geotechnical qualifications likely required under this contract? 2. On page 16 of the RFQ, it reads that 3.14 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians is a prequalification, however the GDOT prequal has 3.14 listed as Historic Rehabilitation. Please verify if the GDOT prequal you require is 3.14 Historic Rehab or 3.13 Facilities for Bicycle and Pedestrians 3. Would you like the Acceptance of the City of Woodstock Agreement to be placed after 4. Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit?
Response: Yes, use 3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians.
Question 3
Posted: 5/12/2022
Question: Regarding Exhibit V, Acceptance of City of Woodstock Agreement - Please provide the City's sample agreement for review and advise where in the submittal Exhibit V should be included? Thank you, Keck & Wood
Response: See addendum 1
Question 4
Posted: 5/19/2022
Question: On page 24 of the RFQ under C. Resources/Workload Capacity, the requirement "2. Project" seems to be incomplete. Should this be taken out or should we add the usual GDOT requirement of 2. Project Manager Commitment Table and 3. Key Team Leaders' Project Commitment Table? (both excluded from pages count)
Response: See Addendum 1
Posted: 5/26/2022
Type of Addition: Addendum 1 - Questions, Draft Contract, & Zoom Link
Overview: Zoom Link
Deadline: 5/31/2022 10:00 AM
Solicitation #: 2022 - 18
Documents:
Posted: 5/3/2022
Question: On pp. 15 & 16 of the RFQ, in the list of area classes, you show "3.14 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians." The correct number for this area class is 3.13; 3.14 is Historic Rehabilitation. Is 3.13 the area class you meant to show? Thanks.
Response: Yes, use 3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians
Posted: 5/10/2022
Question: Good afternoon, Please see below questions concerning RFQ 2022-18. 1. Are additional Geotechnical qualifications likely required under this contract? 2. On page 16 of the RFQ, it reads that 3.14 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians is a prequalification, however the GDOT prequal has 3.14 listed as Historic Rehabilitation. Please verify if the GDOT prequal you require is 3.14 Historic Rehab or 3.13 Facilities for Bicycle and Pedestrians 3. Would you like the Acceptance of the City of Woodstock Agreement to be placed after 4. Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit?
Response: Yes, use 3.13 Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians.
Posted: 5/12/2022
Question: Regarding Exhibit V, Acceptance of City of Woodstock Agreement - Please provide the City's sample agreement for review and advise where in the submittal Exhibit V should be included? Thank you, Keck & Wood
Response: See addendum 1
Posted: 5/19/2022
Question: On page 24 of the RFQ under C. Resources/Workload Capacity, the requirement "2. Project" seems to be incomplete. Should this be taken out or should we add the usual GDOT requirement of 2. Project Manager Commitment Table and 3. Key Team Leaders' Project Commitment Table? (both excluded from pages count)
Response: See Addendum 1