Arlington County Government Sealed Solicitation
Title: 24-AED-RFP-484 Consulting Services for Innovation District Study
Deadline: 1/16/2024 1:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Status: Awarded
Solicitation Number: 24-AED-RFP-484
Description: The County is seeking to obtain the services of a qualified contractor to conduct an Innovation District Scoping Study that will assist Arlington Economic Development, Alexandria Economic Development Partnership, and National Landing Business Improvement District (National Landing Innovation Stakeholders) in confirming a pathway for National Landing’s evolution as a premier innovation district.
Documents:
Documents as of 12/18/2023 |
---|
RFP No. 24-AED-RFP-484 Consulting Services for Innovation District Study.pdf |
Proposal Submittal Forms.pdf |
Addition 1
Posted: 1/5/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1
Overview: This Addendum changes the reference criteria to add additional references
Documents:
Addition 2
Posted: 2/2/2024
Type of Addition: In Review
Addition 3
Posted: 3/8/2024
Type of Addition: Notice of Award Information
Overview: RFP No. 24-AED-RFP-484: Consulting Services for Innovation District Study is awarded to CIC Captains of Innovation, LLC
Documents:
Question 1
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Can the RFP be extended by 2 weeks? The availability to deliver a well written response is a challenge due to the holidays, therefore we would need a two-week extension to put forward a quality proposal.
Response: The current Proposal due date will remain as is.
Question 2
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Can the project be delivered virtually?
Response: Some stakeholder engagement should occur in person, although the specifics of in-person versus virtual engagement should be recommended by the consultant and finalized in conjunction with Arlington Economic Development
Question 3
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What is the expected completion date or the expected duration of the project?
Response: Please reference Section V PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 7. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS, D. PROJECT KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING, DELIVERY APPROACH, AND METHODOLOGY, the offeror shall include “a detailed description of processes, methods, and timeline for the work proposed.”
Question 4
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What is the anticipated start date?
Response: The County anticipates starting the project once the contract is awarded.
Question 5
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Is there a projected budget allocated for this project?
Response: The County does not disclose its budget. Offerors should propose their costs based on the scope of work.
Question 6
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • GHD North American resources are spread across the US and Canada, with additional subject matter expertise and experience in our global talent pool. Are resources outside of NA allowed to work on the project?
Response: Yes, resources outside of North America are allowed to work on the project as long as they meet the criteria of the RFP.
Question 7
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Is there a template or formatting guidelines for submission? This can include page limits, preference for presentation vs. word document, and as well accessibility guidelines.
Response: Please reference Section V. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION and 7. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Question 8
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What specific strategic objectives does the community aim to achieve through the establishment of an innovation district beyond what's mentioned in the RFP?
Response: Section IV Scope of Services provides several desired benefits. Additionally, the innovation district should create an environment that boosts startup activity and becomes the economic engine for Alexandria and Arlington.
Question 9
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What key stakeholders, both public and private, are expected to be engaged for this project? • Have any specific metrics or indicators been identified to measure the success and impact of the innovation district?
Response: Please reference the RFP Section II. INTRODUCTION TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 24-AED-RFP-484 for key stakeholders. Reference Section IV. SCOPE OF SERVICES, 1. C Economic Impact Analysis. The awarded consultant should recommend additional metrics
Question 10
Posted: 12/28/2023
Question: We understand that the County actively works to procure woman-owned and minority-owned businesses. Does the County have specific goals for what percentage of the fee for this effort should go to those types of enterprises?
Response: No, the County does not require specific goals for what percentage of the fee for this effort should go to those types of enterprises.
Question 11
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Is there a goal that would define the success of this project, e.g. National Landing is a top 5 or 10 Innovation District?
Response: While the County believes National Landing can be the leading innovation district in the U.S. for the technology verticals that it will cover, there is no defined goal at this stage. We welcome input from the consultant on a realistic goal based on the assets within National Landing.
Question 12
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Are you looking for alternative strategies such as a go slow patch versus a go big path"
Response: The County understands that the eventual strategy will depend on funding availability and partner engagement; therefore, we are open to alternative strategies that consider both a “slow” and “go big” path. With that said, we intend to create a leading innovation district in a reasonable amount of time.
Question 13
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Should the consultant consider any funding constraints on the implementation plan (what can we do for $10 M, or what will take to be top 5), or timeline constraints/goals (3,5 or 10 years)?
Response: Given the County does not have clarity on potential funding sources or funding amounts, we do not have specific funding limitations in mind. We would be interested in understanding the potential impact related to different funding amounts and reasonable timelines for those impacts to occur.
Question 14
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: How important is minority participation?
Response: The County supports and welcomes minority participation. However, minority participation is not a requirement for this solicitation and will not be evaluated.
Question 15
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Two deadlines for Questions Regarding the Original Solicitation were stated on page 4 of the RFP (December 29 @5pm & January 4 @5pm). Will a clarification addendum be issued?
Response: An addendum will be forthcoming. However, the Question Deadline is January 4, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Question 16
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Must the three required references (Section E, page 14) be limited to consulting services for innovative district studies alone? Can they be expanded to market analysis, organizational assessment services, economic development, improvement district analyses, etc.
Response: References will be accepted for consulting services provided to related studies, including target industry analysis, organizational assessment services, economic development improvement district analysis, etc. References related to innovation district studies are preferred. An addendum is forthcoming to reflect this change.
Question 17
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: When can Offerors expect answers to submitted questions. Will answers be issued as an addendum?
Response: The County will respond to all questions within a 24-48 business hr. timeframe. Questions may be responded to via Vendor Registry or an addendum.
Question 18
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will the County’s project team/representative be in position to assist in facilitating communications with 3rd party organizations/stakeholders around the collection of sensitive data.
Response: The County's project team may be available to assist in obtaining data and reports from 3rd-party organizations, specifically colleges and universities, business improvement districts, local jurisdictions, and property owners
Question 19
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What are the peer innovation clusters/districts in North America that National Landing looks to as models?
Response: Potential peer innovation clusters/districts include Cambridge (Kendall Square), Seattle (South Lake Union), St Louis (Cortex), Raleigh-Durham (Research Triangle), and Atlanta (Midtown).
Question 20
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What was the impetus for this Study at this time?
Response: There has been interest in creating an innovation district since the announcement of Amazon HQ2 and the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus, this study is the agreed-upon next step in that process.
Question 21
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What is the preferred date for a final deliverable?
Response: There is no preferred date for the final deliverable. The schedule will be determined between AED and the consultant
Question 22
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Has a committee been formed for this project? Who is represented on that committee?
Response: No Committee has been formed. Arlington Economic Development will solely oversee this study, while the Alexandria Economic Development Partnership and National Landing Business Improvement District will be consulted throughout the project.
Question 23
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will data from previous studies (e.g., the National Landing Market Impact Study) be made available to the consultant?
Response: Yes, data from previous studies will be made available to the consultant.
Question 24
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Is there existing buy-in from regional companies and academic institutions to support the formation of the district?
Response: There is initial buy-in from a select number of companies and academic institutions, although we expect this study and follow-up engagement will generate increased support for the formation of the district.
Question 25
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Do you expect a comprehensive workforce/labor market study to be part of the ecosystem analysis?
Response: No. A comprehensive workforce/labor market study is not required and will not be part of the ecosystem analysis.
Question 26
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Does the County envision committees of subject matter experts to guide the development of strategic roadmaps for each prioritized technology vertical?
Response: Following the scoping study, the County and partners in the innovation district will determine the development of strategic roadmaps for each prioritized technology vertical.
Question 27
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will the county be available to support stakeholder engagement activities, i.e. contacts, scheduling, venues, etc.
Response: Yes, the County will be available to support stakeholder engagement activities, i.e. contacts, scheduling, venues, etc.
Posted: 1/5/2024
Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1
Overview: This Addendum changes the reference criteria to add additional references
Documents:
Posted: 2/2/2024
Type of Addition: In Review
Posted: 3/8/2024
Type of Addition: Notice of Award Information
Overview: RFP No. 24-AED-RFP-484: Consulting Services for Innovation District Study is awarded to CIC Captains of Innovation, LLC
Documents:
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Can the RFP be extended by 2 weeks? The availability to deliver a well written response is a challenge due to the holidays, therefore we would need a two-week extension to put forward a quality proposal.
Response: The current Proposal due date will remain as is.
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Can the project be delivered virtually?
Response: Some stakeholder engagement should occur in person, although the specifics of in-person versus virtual engagement should be recommended by the consultant and finalized in conjunction with Arlington Economic Development
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What is the expected completion date or the expected duration of the project?
Response: Please reference Section V PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 7. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS, D. PROJECT KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING, DELIVERY APPROACH, AND METHODOLOGY, the offeror shall include “a detailed description of processes, methods, and timeline for the work proposed.”
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What is the anticipated start date?
Response: The County anticipates starting the project once the contract is awarded.
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Is there a projected budget allocated for this project?
Response: The County does not disclose its budget. Offerors should propose their costs based on the scope of work.
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • GHD North American resources are spread across the US and Canada, with additional subject matter expertise and experience in our global talent pool. Are resources outside of NA allowed to work on the project?
Response: Yes, resources outside of North America are allowed to work on the project as long as they meet the criteria of the RFP.
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • Is there a template or formatting guidelines for submission? This can include page limits, preference for presentation vs. word document, and as well accessibility guidelines.
Response: Please reference Section V. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, 2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION and 7. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What specific strategic objectives does the community aim to achieve through the establishment of an innovation district beyond what's mentioned in the RFP?
Response: Section IV Scope of Services provides several desired benefits. Additionally, the innovation district should create an environment that boosts startup activity and becomes the economic engine for Alexandria and Arlington.
Posted: 12/22/2023
Question: • What key stakeholders, both public and private, are expected to be engaged for this project? • Have any specific metrics or indicators been identified to measure the success and impact of the innovation district?
Response: Please reference the RFP Section II. INTRODUCTION TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 24-AED-RFP-484 for key stakeholders. Reference Section IV. SCOPE OF SERVICES, 1. C Economic Impact Analysis. The awarded consultant should recommend additional metrics
Posted: 12/28/2023
Question: We understand that the County actively works to procure woman-owned and minority-owned businesses. Does the County have specific goals for what percentage of the fee for this effort should go to those types of enterprises?
Response: No, the County does not require specific goals for what percentage of the fee for this effort should go to those types of enterprises.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Is there a goal that would define the success of this project, e.g. National Landing is a top 5 or 10 Innovation District?
Response: While the County believes National Landing can be the leading innovation district in the U.S. for the technology verticals that it will cover, there is no defined goal at this stage. We welcome input from the consultant on a realistic goal based on the assets within National Landing.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Are you looking for alternative strategies such as a go slow patch versus a go big path"
Response: The County understands that the eventual strategy will depend on funding availability and partner engagement; therefore, we are open to alternative strategies that consider both a “slow” and “go big” path. With that said, we intend to create a leading innovation district in a reasonable amount of time.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Should the consultant consider any funding constraints on the implementation plan (what can we do for $10 M, or what will take to be top 5), or timeline constraints/goals (3,5 or 10 years)?
Response: Given the County does not have clarity on potential funding sources or funding amounts, we do not have specific funding limitations in mind. We would be interested in understanding the potential impact related to different funding amounts and reasonable timelines for those impacts to occur.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: How important is minority participation?
Response: The County supports and welcomes minority participation. However, minority participation is not a requirement for this solicitation and will not be evaluated.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Two deadlines for Questions Regarding the Original Solicitation were stated on page 4 of the RFP (December 29 @5pm & January 4 @5pm). Will a clarification addendum be issued?
Response: An addendum will be forthcoming. However, the Question Deadline is January 4, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Must the three required references (Section E, page 14) be limited to consulting services for innovative district studies alone? Can they be expanded to market analysis, organizational assessment services, economic development, improvement district analyses, etc.
Response: References will be accepted for consulting services provided to related studies, including target industry analysis, organizational assessment services, economic development improvement district analysis, etc. References related to innovation district studies are preferred. An addendum is forthcoming to reflect this change.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: When can Offerors expect answers to submitted questions. Will answers be issued as an addendum?
Response: The County will respond to all questions within a 24-48 business hr. timeframe. Questions may be responded to via Vendor Registry or an addendum.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will the County’s project team/representative be in position to assist in facilitating communications with 3rd party organizations/stakeholders around the collection of sensitive data.
Response: The County's project team may be available to assist in obtaining data and reports from 3rd-party organizations, specifically colleges and universities, business improvement districts, local jurisdictions, and property owners
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What are the peer innovation clusters/districts in North America that National Landing looks to as models?
Response: Potential peer innovation clusters/districts include Cambridge (Kendall Square), Seattle (South Lake Union), St Louis (Cortex), Raleigh-Durham (Research Triangle), and Atlanta (Midtown).
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What was the impetus for this Study at this time?
Response: There has been interest in creating an innovation district since the announcement of Amazon HQ2 and the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus, this study is the agreed-upon next step in that process.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: What is the preferred date for a final deliverable?
Response: There is no preferred date for the final deliverable. The schedule will be determined between AED and the consultant
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Has a committee been formed for this project? Who is represented on that committee?
Response: No Committee has been formed. Arlington Economic Development will solely oversee this study, while the Alexandria Economic Development Partnership and National Landing Business Improvement District will be consulted throughout the project.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will data from previous studies (e.g., the National Landing Market Impact Study) be made available to the consultant?
Response: Yes, data from previous studies will be made available to the consultant.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Is there existing buy-in from regional companies and academic institutions to support the formation of the district?
Response: There is initial buy-in from a select number of companies and academic institutions, although we expect this study and follow-up engagement will generate increased support for the formation of the district.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Do you expect a comprehensive workforce/labor market study to be part of the ecosystem analysis?
Response: No. A comprehensive workforce/labor market study is not required and will not be part of the ecosystem analysis.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Does the County envision committees of subject matter experts to guide the development of strategic roadmaps for each prioritized technology vertical?
Response: Following the scoping study, the County and partners in the innovation district will determine the development of strategic roadmaps for each prioritized technology vertical.
Posted: 1/4/2024
Question: Will the county be available to support stakeholder engagement activities, i.e. contacts, scheduling, venues, etc.
Response: Yes, the County will be available to support stakeholder engagement activities, i.e. contacts, scheduling, venues, etc.