Okaloosa County Sealed Solicitation

Title: Inmate Telecommunication Services for Okaloosa County Department of Corrections

Deadline: 6/6/2024 3:00 PM   (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)

Status: Awarded

Solicitation Number: RFP COR 53-24

Description:

Inmate Telecommunication Services for Okaloosa County Department of Corrections RFP COR 53-24
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Okaloosa County, FL, will accept sealed bids until 3:00 PM (CST) May 29, 2024 for the Construction Services for Inmate Telecommunication Services for Okaloosa County Department of Corrections.
Interested respondents desiring consideration shall submit their response online at Vendor Registry through the link provided below:

https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Bids/View/BidsList?BuyerId=21d474a1-e536-4f4d-9f2c-77c3b1e3c683

Unless otherwise stipulated in the bid/bid description, all responses must be submitted using Vendor Registry only. No other means of submission of responses will be accepted. Responses will be accepted by Vendor Registry until 3:00 PM (CST) May 29, 2024, at which time all timely submitted bids will be opened and reviewed.

A Mandatory Pre-Proposal meeting will be conducted at Department of Corrections located at 1200 East James Lee Blvd., Crestview, FL 32539, on May 14, 2024 at 1:00 PM (CST).

The County reserves the right to award the bid to the lowest responsive respondent and to waive any irregularity or technicality in bids received. Okaloosa County shall be the sole judge of the bid and the resulting Agreement that is in its best interest and its decision shall be final.


Pre-Bid Meeting Date: 5/14/2024 1:00 PM

Pre-Bid Meeting Details: Please sign up if you plan to attend the pre-bid meeting.A Mandatory Pre-Proposal meeting will be conducted at Department of Corrections located at 1200 East James Lee Blvd., Crestview, FL 32539, on May 14, 2024 at 1:00 PM (CST).


Documents:

Documents as of 4/29/2024
Login to view documents
Addition 1

Posted: 5/15/2024

Type of Addition: Addendum 1

Overview: I. Questions / Answers 

II. Attached Layout of Okaloosa County Jail.
III. Attached Call Commission Reports for April 2023 – March 2024.

Deadline: 5/29/2024 3:00 PM

Solicitation #: RFP COR 53-24

Documents:

Addition 2

Posted: 5/22/2024

Type of Addition: Addendum 2

Overview: ADDENDUM 2
May 22, 2024
RFP COR 53-24
Inmate Telecommunication Services for Okaloosa County Department of Corrections
Please find the attached document and information below, for the above referenced Addendum 1. This Addendum is hereby made a part of the Contract Documents and Specifications of the above referenced project. All other requirements of the original Contract Documents and Specifications shall remain effective in their respective order.
The purpose of Addendum 1 is to address vendor questions submitted prior to the last day for questions date.
Questions / Answers

The bid opening date has been revised to June 6, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. (CST).

Deadline: 6/6/2024 3:00 PM

Solicitation #: RFP COR 53-24

Documents:

Addition 3

Posted: 7/15/2024

Type of Addition: Intent to Award (ITA) 7/12/24

Overview: MAG is $750,000.00

Amount: $750,000.00

Documents:

Question 1

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Is there an online/virtual option for the Mandatory Prebidders Conference?

Response: No. A member of your business must physical attend the Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting.

Question 2

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Do the Insurance Requirements need to be presented with the Proposal or at the time of the Award?

Response: The Insurance Requirements must be provided after the Intent to Award (ITA) is issued.

Question 3

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: We plan on sending a representative to attend the mandatory pre-bid meeting. When the "Sign-up for Pre-Bid Meeting" icon is selected, it automatically populates with the name of the company representative associated with the Vendor Registry profile. However, we would like to send a representative other than the one that is associated with the Vendor Registry profile. Is it acceptable to sign-up for the pre-bid meeting and send a different company representative than the one that the system's automatically defaults to?

Response: Yes. There will be a sign-in sheet at the Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting and will be the only documentation to reflect who attended the meeting.

Question 4

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide the average daily population for the last three months, broken down by month, if possible?

Response: May – 695, June – 685, July – 658, August – 658, September – 673, October – 687, November – 696, December – 679, January – 674, February – 707, March – 710, April – 704

Question 5

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide a copy of each agreement/contract and all amendments (if applicable) the County has executed with its incumbent inmate Telephone System (ITS), Video Visitation System (VVS) and Tablet provider(s)?

Response: The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 6

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: RFP "Attachment B - Insurance Requirements," states: "A performance bond will be required in the amount of $100,000.00 of the estimated contract value. The performance bonds must be submitted with the signed agreement." If a vendor is proposing a solution in which all technologies and services will furnished, installed, maintained and support at no cost to the County, is the vendor still required to submit a performance bond?

Response: Yes

Question 7

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide a breakdown by housing unit of the inmate capacity in each. The inmate capacity for each cell block is necessary for determining network requirements and charging stations needed to support the tablets.

Response: Alpha POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section Bravo POD – Up to 35 in each section A Section B Section C Section Charlie POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Delta POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Echo POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Upstairs – Up to 25 in each section (A, B, C, D) Observation cell 1 - 2 Observation cell 2 - 2 Observation cell 3 - 2 A Section B Section C Section D Section Downstairs – Up to 4 in each cell. Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 Cell 10 Cell 11 Cell 12

Question 8

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide a copies of Call Detail/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of all ITS calls, minutes, commission rates and revenues?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 9

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide copies of Call Detail/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of all VVS calls, minutes, commission rates and revenues?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 10

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide copies of Tablet/Kiosk Revenue/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of tablet/kiosk service usage, service cost, revenue and commissions received from inmate electronic messaging (aka email), entertainment, tablets, video messaging, etc?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 11

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide monthly revenue/commission reports regarding inmate tablet device rentals for the past three months?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 12

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please detail all costs/fees associated with inmate tablet device rentals?

Response: In current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 13

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Does the County receive commissions on revenue generated by interstate calls today?

Response: Yes

Question 14

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm that vendors are required to pay the same commission amount for all ITS call payment options (premium, prepaid, debit and collect) and call types (local, interstate, intrastate, international, etc.)?

Response: Yes (see current contract) The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 15

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: What limits does the County place, if any, on use of the services in this RFP such as maximum number of onsite visits allowed per week (or other interval), remote visits per week, calls per week, minutes per call/visit, etc?

Response: Inmates must be permitted the availability of two (2) hrs / wk visitation This it a combination of remote/onsite visits, paid and free. Currently they are Twenty (20) minutes/per visit. Phone calls to not have a minimum/maximum amount per week and can be as long as Thirty (30) min/per call.

Question 16

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many inmate tablet devices are currently available for inmate rental at the facility?

Response: Must be enough for each inmate to have one. Currently ADP runs 700-750.

Question 17

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many inmate tablet device charging stations/carts currently installed at the facility?

Response: Fifty (50)

Question 18

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many officer tablet devices are currently available in the facility?

Response: Eight (8)

Question 19

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please outline the fees that are being charged to end-users: a). Bill Statement Fee, b). PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Web, c). PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Live Operator and d). Fees for Instant Pay Calls (if applicable)

Response: See current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 20

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Is the inmate banking/trust account managed through the commissary system or the Jail Management System (JMS) or other system? If other, please specify.

Response: Commissary

Question 21

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Who is the County's current inmate banking/trust fund services provider?

Response: Oasis (Lockdown)

Question 22

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Who is the County's current Jail Management System (JMS) provider?

Response: XJail

Question 23

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: After the first round of questions is answered, will the County accept additional questions if clarification is needed for any of the County’s responses?

Response: Yes - 1 week

Question 24

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Will the County please provide current commission rates and historical revenue for the past 12 months for each of the following: a. Phone Calls b. Video Visitation c. Messages i. Text ii. Email iii. Other d. Entertainment e. Tablet Rental, if applicable

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 25

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Did the County receive a signing bonus or any type of other payments/incentives in association with the current contract? If so, please describe the amount and purpose.

Response: No

Question 26

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: We have reviewed the current contract information on the County website, and it is unclear if the Minimum Annual Guarantee of $700,000 still applies or if it has been removed or adjusted to a different amount? Please confirm if A) a Minimum Annual Guarantee applies, B) What is the amount of the MAG for the current year, and C) Was the MAG for the most recent complete year met by the commissions paid?

Response: Yes, still applies. Has been met with commissions paid.

Question 27

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Do detainees currently have the ability to place telephone calls using their tablets?

Response: Yes.

Question 28

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Does the current vendor provide full-time employees in similar roles required in the RFP?

Response: Yes.

Question 29

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: When registering on Vendor Registry, only one name was allowed and Mr. Bill Pope is the President / Owner. How do we add the name of the person attending the pre-bid, Mr. Mitch Folsom?

Response: You will need to reach out to Vendor Registry. However, the name on Vendor Registry does not have match the name on who will attend. We will have a sign-in sheet at the Pre-Bid Meeting.

Question 30

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide several recent commission reports for the Jail, showing calls, minutes and revenue (or at minimum paid minutes).

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 31

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide average monthly revenue data for any additional services offered under the current contract, such as voicemail, messaging, etc.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 32

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the current vendor offer any alternate calling types, such as Advance Pay, PayNow or Text-to-Connect? If so, what are the rates and fees charged for these calls?

Response: Yes. Outlined in current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 33

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please outline the fees that are being charged to end-users: a. Bill Statement Fee b. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Web c. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via IVR d. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Live Operator e. Fees for Instant Pay Calls

Response: Product and services fees/rates are outlined in the current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 34

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the commission percentage currently received on inmate telephone revenue.

Response: See Addendum 1. Commission reports attached, percentages outlined in current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 35

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the total average monthly commissions received for all services received over the past year from the current vendor.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 36

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the County receive commissions on revenue generated by interstate calls today?

Response: Yes.

Question 37

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the County require that proposals include commissions on interstate calls?

Response: Yes.

Question 38

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Do commissions from this contract go to the Inmate Welfare Fund, the Sheriff’s Office discretionary fund, or the County general fund?

Response: Inmate Welfare Fund

Question 39

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Will the County allow for a proposal to present multiple pricing options for the County’s consideration?

Response: Yes.

Question 40

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide a breakdown of the inmate population, in percentages or actual numbers, by local, DOC, or other agency.

Response: We only have one location and are not State DOC.

Question 41

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the average daily population for the last 12 months, broken down by month, if possible?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 42

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What is the bed count of the facility?

Response: Rated for 594. ADP is 700-750

Question 43

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Is the inmate trust account managed through the commissary system or the Jail Management System or other system? If other, please specify.

Response: Commissary.

Question 44

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Commissary Integration – Please provide the name and contact information for the current commissary vendor.

Response: Oasis – Greg Webb – gwebb@oasiscommissar.com

Question 45

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Jail Management Integration – Please provide the name and contact information for the current JMS vendor.

Response: XJail - will be changing

Question 46

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: In order to ensure a level playing field for all bidders, please confirm that the successful vendor must provide new equipment. Also, please verify that this applies to both new potential bidders and the incumbent provider.

Response: Yes, there will be new equipment required. If the incumbent provider is successful at procuring the bid, then they must ensure our current equipment is the latest available equipment their company offers.

Question 47

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the schedule in which the inmates have access to the inmate phones.

Response: 07:05 – 12:25 13:15 – 17:25 19:10 – 21:55

Question 48

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: How is commissary ordered today?

Response: Via phone.

Question 49

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the current vendor provide debit calling? If so, how are debit accounts funded – e.g., through an inmate’s trust account, lobby kiosk, phone / website payments, etc.? Please list all available methods.

Response: Yes. Current provider has a debit account that can be funded via direct deposits from friends and family through their website or the inmate has the option to transfer funds from their commissary account to their debit account. Upon release/transfer, the remaining funds are transferred to the commissary account and released with the inmate.

Question 50

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Are calling cards being used today? If so, how are they purchased and given to the inmate? What denominations are available?

Response: No.

Question 51

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What limits does the County place, if any, on use of the services in this RFP –maximum number of onsite visits allowed per week (or other interval), remote visits per week, calls per week, minutes per call/visit, etc?

Response: Maximum amount of visitation per week is two (2) hours. This can be a combination of onsite/remote visitations free and at cost. The max amount of visitation per day allowed, of any combination of type of visit, is 1 hour or 3 – 20-minute visitations. (attorney visitations do not calculate in this) There is no limit to the quantity of phone calls permitted per day/week. Max time on a phone call is 30 minutes.

Question 52

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Do you currently have an inmate tablets program? If so: a. How many tablets does the County have today? b. Who is the tablet manufacturer? c. Do inmates share the tablets? How do they check them out? d. Exactly what services and applications are offered on the tablets? e. Are the tablets interfaced with the JMS and for what purpose?

Response: a. enough for ADP (700-750) b. Unknown c. no. they each have their own assigned tablet d. ebooks, radio, games, movies, forms, music, educational, facility notices, law library, text connect, emessages, photos, e. the tablets are not individually interfaced with the JMS. The inmate communications system is. This triggers the account to be opened/closed in the communications system when the inmate is booked/released, assigns the inmate PIN number used to access the call system, and triggers remaining debit funds to be transferred to commissary upon release from the facility.

Question 53

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Digital USPS inmate mail delivery is a required service in the RFP. Does the County prefer to have a scanner so that facility staff can scan mail onsite, or do you prefer to have mail directed to an offsite mail processing center operated by the vendor?

Response: On-site.

Question 54

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What is the average number of inmate mail pieces received daily? Of these, what percentage are legal mail?

Response: 50-100 public mail. Legal mail will continue to be delivered to the inmate and not be scanned into the system.

Question 55

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Sections 3.68.1 and 4.3.21 require law library access on the kiosks and tablets. Do you have a subscription to a law library service today, or is the vendor expected to provide the law library subscription?

Response: Vendor will provide.

Question 56

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the historical or estimated/projected call volumes that will be used in the evaluation of calling rates.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 57

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Some vendors provide alternate payment options, such as the ability to purchase a one-time phone call using a credit or debit card, without the necessity of setting up a prepaid account, and typically pay little to no commission on these calls. Will the County please confirm that vendors are required to pay the same commission amount for all calls, including premium, prepaid, debit and collect?

Response: We are open to proposals in regards to this.

Question 58

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: After the first round of questions is answered, will the County accept additional questions if clarification is needed for any of the County’s responses?

Response: Yes.

Question 59

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Section 4.3.3 of the RFP requires officer tablets. How many officer tablets are required?

Response: 8-10

Question 60

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: The current equipment counts in section 2.4 and the required equipment counts in section 3.57.2 are different. In fact, there are significantly fewer phones required than are currently in place according to these numbers. Please clarify, which section shows accurate required equipment quantities?

Response: The amounts in 2.4 are the current wall phones that are only for phone calls. In 3.57.2 we are requesting to have most of those units upgraded to kiosks which, in addition to phone calls, allow other types of activities such as video visitation, emessage, law library, grievance portal, etc.

Question 61

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: In order to provide our best possible offer, it is very important to have historical usage data for all revenue streams. This data is necessary to estimate costs as well as potential revenues. The current vendor has access to this information, so distributing the information to other vendors in a timely fashion will ensure a level playing field for all bidders. Please provide as much data as possible from the following: Call Revenue – # of calls per month, # of minutes per month, total revenue per month for each: • LOCAL – Collect • INTRALATA – Collect • INTERLATA – Collect • INTERSTATE – Collect • LOCAL – Debit • INTRALATA – Debit • INTERLATA – Debit • INTERSTATE – Debit • International – Debit • LOCAL – Prepaid Collect • INTRALATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERLATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERSTATE – Prepaid Collect Tablet Revenue - # transactions per month, cost basis (per minute / message / month / song purchase, etc.) and total revenue per month for each: • Tablet Lease • Electronic Messaging • Video Messaging • Entertainment Content Video Visitation Revenue • # Visits Per Month • # of Minutes per Month (if minute based) • Total Revenue Per Month

Response: See Addendum 1.

Question 62

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: To evaluate usage data and additional revenue potential, it is very helpful to have the rates currently being charged to end-users under the current contract. Please provide the following: Call Category – Rate for First Minute and for Each Additional Minute for each: • LOCAL – Collect • INTRALATA – Collect • INTERLATA – Collect • INTERSTATE – Collect • LOCAL – Debit • INTRALATA – Debit • INTERLATA – Debit • INTERSTATE – Debit • International – Debit • LOCAL – Prepaid Collect • INTRALATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERLATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERSTATE – Prepaid Collect Tablet Rates – Rate Charged and Cost Basis (flat rate or per-minute fee) for each: • Tablet Rental Fee • Movie Rental • TV Show Rental • Music • Games • Video Rentals • Video Purchases Video Visitation Rates • Per-Visit or Per-Minute Rate • Cost Basis (per visit or per-minute Messaging Rates – Rate Charged and Cost Basis (per message or per minute) for each: • Voicemail • Email/Text Message • Video Message

Response: In current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Question 63

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q1 Re: No. 8 Contract for Services. To acknowledge exceptions to the Terms and Agreements of the standard agreement, would Okaloosa County prefer we list exceptions under this paragraph, or should we include a “redlined” copy of the Sample Agreement as an Attachment?

Response: No preference.

Question 64

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q2 Re: Integrity of Proposal Documents. Could the County please define what is meant by “only in the spaces where a response is requested”? For example, in the Response Documents # 1-15, there are underlined blank spaces where we are to provide the response. However, throughout most of the documents, There are no underlined blank spaces. Most requirements have a single line between them and the following response. Can we add spaces there in order to provide the response? As an example of that, Requirement 3.62.15, we are instructed that we must ensure and state that all maintenance calls from the Department shall be answered by a “live” operator/service representative at all times. Can we insert the response and explanation there, or does the County want us to create an addendum for each of those answers? Because the RFP states: “Any modifications or alterations to the original proposal documents by the respondent, whether intentional or otherwise, will constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal. Any such modifications or alterations that a respondent wishes to propose must be clearly stated in the respondent’s response in the form of an addendum to the original proposal documents.” Because there is a risk of disqualification, please provide clarification on how we are to structure our response.

Response: You can provide your answers under each section.

Question 65

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q3 Re: Attachment “A”. Vendor’s Proposal We are not sure what to put in this attachment. Our entire response will be the “Vendor’s Proposal”. Should we consider that the desired content here is a summary of our solution and offer? Please clarify what should go here.

Response: It is part of the draft contract and we will insert the winning proposer’s response during the contract preparation.

Question 66

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q4 Re Cover/Transmittal Letter and Executive Summary. We generally provide a Cover/Transmittal Letter and Executive Summary near the beginning of a proposal response. Should we add a Cover Letter and/or Executive Summary after the Acknowledgement Form, or would that be considered a modification or alteration to the original proposal documents?

Response: A cover letter is not considered a modification.

Question 67

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q5 Re: Table of Contents We normally provide a Table of Contents at the beginning of the response. Do we correctly assume this would not be considered a modification or alteration of the original proposal documents, and thus we can we add that to the response, or should we not include a Table of Contents?

Response: A table of contents is not considered a modification.

Question 68

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q6 Preparation of Proposal – words and numbers. Pricing, rates, fees, etc, are normally included in tables to enhance clarity of the offering. Does the County require these amounts be in both words and numbers? Within a table, for example, should we show the price as: $0.55 per minute AND Fifty-Five cents per minute? Outside of pricing tables, if we are referencing, for example, number of employees or years of service, does the County require that those figures be presented in both works and numbers?

Response: Numbers only are acceptable.

Question 69

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q7 Re: Proposal Price for each section, Item, alternative, adjustment, unit price item listed therein, or the words “No Proposal”, “No Change”, or “Not Applicable” entered. We normally provide a consolidated Financial offer with details included there. Does the County require pricing to be distributed throughout the RFP, rather than in a consolidated financial offer? Could the County identify What they mean by a section or item? Given this instruction, we are not sure where the County needs pricing. We don’t see blank, underlined forms or spaces where we can provide that information. Under 9. Cost Proposal, we assume all pricing would be located in this section. Given the instruction above, we are concerned that may not be correct. Given the instruction provided, we want to be sure we are responding per requirements: “All blanks in the proposal documents shall be completed electronically in both words and numbers with the amounts extended, totaled and the proposal signed. A proposal price shall be indicated for each section, proposal item, alternative, adjustment unit price item, and unit price item listed therein, or the words “No Proposal”, “No Change”, or “Not Applicable” entered. No changes shall be made to the phraseology of the form or in the items mentioned therein. In case of any discrepancy between the written amount and the numeric figures, the written amount shall govern. Any proposal which contains any omissions, erasures, alterations, additions, irregularities of any kind, or items not called for which shall in any manner fail to conform to the conditions of public notice inviting proposals may be rejected.”

Response: You may submit one cost proposal for all items requested in Section 4.

Question 70

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q8 Under the Addendum section, we are told that written addenda or modification shall be part of the RFP and that it will be issued five (5) days prior to the date and time of closing. The questions are being answered online at the Bid site. Are these considered binding as part of the RFP, and how would you like us to acknowledge them? (Response Document #6 provides space for an Addendum Number and date.)

Response: We will post an addendum after the question/answer period that will have all questions asked form vendors. The vendors are required to review and acknowledge that they received the addendums.

Question 71

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q9 Comply Statements We generally insert a Comply statement after each requirement to show we have Read, Understood, and Will Comply with the requirement. If we add that to each requirement, would that be considered a modification or alteration to the original proposal documents or can we include that statement? These show acceptance of each requirement and provide an easy -to-read separation between the requirement and any written responses provided.

Response: It would not be concerned a modification/alteration.

Question 72

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: As a supplement to the question posed here, we would also provide a copy of our Master Services Agreement as an attachment, if the County would prefer that approach. Question Type: My Question Question submit date: 5/13/2024 7:26:27 AM Question: Q1 Re: No. 8 Contract for Services. To acknowledge exceptions to the Terms and Agreements of the standard agreement, would Okaloosa County prefer we list exceptions under this paragraph, or should we include a “redlined” copy of the Sample Agreement as an Attachment?

Response: We will be using our County approved agreement which is attached to the RFP.

Question 73

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm who the Trust Accounting Vendor is?

Response: If you are referring to the inmate commissary account, that is through Oasis (Lockdown).

Question 74

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.59, states system acceptance is 30 consecutive days post completion and testing with problem free within 60 days of the installation date, Will the County please confirm if all services are to be installed within 90 business days?

Response: Yes.

Question 75

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.3, 3.3.1 states two full time technicians must be included with the solution offered to the County. Would the County please clarify what the specific tasks are for each of the technicians? For example, one technician for administration and repair of tablets and the other technician is working on administration and repair of video visitation and inmate telephone system. Please clarify each of the jobs?

Response: We would like for both to be fully trained and able to address any maintenance issues as well as do the administrative side of monitoring visits, calls, assigning tablets, assisting the public when needed, ets. This gives the county assurance that when one tech is on PTO, the one remaining is able to fulfill all needed duties.

Question 76

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.3.1 Does the current vendor provide two technicians for the County today?

Response: Currently we are provided 1.5 onsite technicians.

Question 77

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm the current ADP?

Response: Current ADP is 713.

Question 78

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Count please confirm if construction services are included with the requirements of this RFP or is this a typo? Will the County please confirm what is meant by construction services?

Response: We will remove that, it was a typo on our end. See updated notice to respondents attached in Addendum 2.

Question 79

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify 8. Understanding of the Project, requirement 8.1 which asks for a line-by-line response to Section V. Scope of Work. This appears to be in conflict of the line-by-line Scope of Work responses required for 3. Scope of Work & Services to be Provided through the end of 4.4 Video Relay Services. Also there does not appear to be a Section V in the RFP. Can the County clarify what is to be provided in response to 8.1?

Response: It looks as if the identifier was changed from roman numerals to numbers. It is meant to read “response to Section 3.” It is requested to have a response from the vendor for the approach, technique and procedures to accomplice each line item in Section 3.

Question 80

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify if the entire response needs to be returned, such as informational sections such as the letter on page 2 of the RFP document, 1. Introduction, 2. Background, 10 Appendix, 11. Evaluation Criteria and 12. Procurement Schedule?

Response: The response should include all necessary information to complete your proposal, all required forms, cost/ fee proposals and all answers to questions within the document. The vendor does not need to include the RFP information, background, appendix, and evaluation criteria and procurement schedule.

Question 81

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify if responses to the General Conditions are required?

Response: A response would only be needed if you are taking exception to one of the conditions.

Question 82

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County confirm the following outline and table of contents will be acceptable for responses? If not, can the County provide an outline? | Cover Letter | Executive Summary | Understanding of the Project | Scope of Work | Cost Proposal | Statement of Qualification | References | Personnel | Addenda | Attachments | Value-Added Options

Response: Yes that will be acceptable.

Question 83

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.4; Requirement states, All system hardware, software, software level and support systems must be compatible with Department inmate software applications and applicable hardware. Question: Will the Department please clarify what hardware and software specifically the Department intends to interface our systems with at the Department. Also, what is the use case for the interface?

Response: The current interfaces are with the JMS to load inmate profiles into the communication system and then with the inmate commissary account as well to allow for transfer to and from the inmate communications debit account.

Question 84

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.67.13; The ITS must average at least a monthly automation rate of seventy-five percent (75%). Eighty percent (80%) is preferred. Will the Department please clarify what is meant by monthly automation rate and how this apply to the inmate telephone system?

Response: This is in regards to the software and interfaces running with very little employee need to manage. In other words, the department doesn’t want a software that has the need of constant input, adjustment, management from employees. We are requesting an automated system that can essentially function independently.

Question 85

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.68.5; Video visitation terminals must have setup availability at an offsite location and be staffed with vendor personnel, if needed, to assist visitors during hours of operation. • Is the Department planning on deploying VVS hardware/system in an offsite visitor center during this contract or is this speaking to a remote visit with Friends & Family with vendor support? • Does the Department currently have a remote VVS visitor center today? • If the Department currently has a remote VVS visitor center, where is it located? How many terminals are there? How many vendor staff support this remote center today? • Does the Department currently conduct video visits at the facility?

Response: 1. We are looking into options for an off site visitation area. Nothing has been confirmed at this time. We wanted it written into the contract because we anticipate it to happen this year. Yes, if needed support then one of the onsite techs would be required to work that visitation area during times of operation. 2. We currently have a public visitation area but it is onsite at the main facility. The goal is to remove unessential personnel from being on the secured grounds. 3. We do not currently have an off-site visitation area. Our current public visitation area has 17 terminals. We currently have a vendor employee that works .5 FTE during visitation hours to assist visitors with getting set up on their terminals, verifying their ID and recording any additional visitors to the visit. We also have a full time vendor employee that assists when needed in that area. 4. Yes, in our public visitation area.

Question 86

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 5.1.3; Certification from the Vendor that they have the ability to commence full operations within forty-five (45) days after notification of award. Will the Department please clarify if this time frame for implementation is in terms of 45 business days? Will the Department please revise to allow for a minimum of ninety (90) days to install the materials and services instead of forty-five (45), as forty-five days does not allow bidders sufficient time to properly complete the installation of the materials and services described in the RFP?

Response: Yes, we will allow for 90 calendar days to complete all installation needed.

Question 87

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 4.3.12; Vendor tablet system network is to be dual encapsulated with servers being dual authenticated. Will the Department please clarify what is meant by the term "dual encapsulated"? What is the County's specific concern here?

Response: The concern is the ability for our very tech savvy inmates being able to hack the tablets and gain access to the internet. Please present any security measures you have in place to prevent this along with references from facilities that use your tablets.

Question 88

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department confirm where inmate tablets are to be physically distributed, (i.e. housing unit or intake)?

Response: They will be distributed at classification. That can be anywhere from 2-7 days after initial booking into the facility.

Question 89

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm if inmates use tablets in Booking/Intake area?

Response: No, they do not.

Question 90

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm if there are outlets for the charging carts in the housing units?

Response: Within the housing sections electrical outlet have been ran.

Question 91

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12-months of Call Data?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Question 92

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: We respectfully request that the Department extend the bid submission date by two weeks from when the final vendor question responses will be provided. This would allow vendors to have an adequate opportunity to review answers to questions that are currently only known to the incumbent provider. The current schedule accepts questions until 05/20/24, which is only 6 business day(s) prior to when vendors will need to upload their proposals.

Response: The bid opening date has been revised to June 6, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. (CST).

Question 93

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm the current commission rate?

Response: The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website

Question 94

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12 months commission/revenue reports for inmate phones, showing calls, minutes and revenue (or at minimum calls and minutes)? If reports are not available, please provide statistics showing the requested data broken down by call type (collect, prepaid, debit, etc.) and tariff type (local, intralata, interlata, interstate, international)?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Question 95

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12 months commission/revenue reports for video visitation, showing the number of visits and minutes per month? If reports are not available, please provide visitation data broken down by type (onsite, free remote, paid remote, paid attorney)?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Question 96

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm how will results of the RFP will be provided once evaluations are complete and the intent to award and/or award has been made?

Response: We will email all vendors with the Intent to Award.

Question 97

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will multiple financial offers be permitted?

Response: The vendor should submit a financial offer based on Section 4 of the RFP. If the vendor wishes to provide additional offers, they should mark it as “optional offers”.

Question 98

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: In the RFP requirements, the County states that “A state contractor license # for the State of Florida shall also be included on the proposal form. Respondent shall be licensed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 489, Florida Statutes.” Section 489.101 states that the purpose of this statute is to regulate the “Construction Industry”. In Section 489.103, telecommunications companies are exempted from this requirement. Section 364.02 defines what a telecommunications company is. Does the County intend to require vendors as telecommunications companies to be licensed within the Construction industry in this RFP?

Response: No, they do not have a license within the Construction industry, however, they shall be licensed to do business in the state of Florida.

Question 99

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm that the Performance Bond is a fixed amount of $100,000.00 or is there some other amount? The requirement states: “A performance bond will be required in the amount of $100,000.00 of the estimated contract value.” (Attachment B, first item.)

Response: The fixed amount of $100,000.00 is correct.

Question 100

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: Given requirements in Response Document No. 14, Can the County confirm that this RFP is supported by Federal Grant Funds?

Response: No, grant funds are being uses, however the response document must be completed in the event federal funds are used in the future.

Question 101

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: Are vendors allowed to present multiple ITS call service/commission rate options?

Response: Please submit in accordance with the RFP. If you choose to submit other options, please title them as optional rates.

Question 102

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to General Conditions; Section 21. COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 119.0701. Would the Department please confirm how vendors will be acting on behalf of Okaloosa County so that it is subject to Florida Statute 119.0701?

Response: The vendor shall follow all the items in Florida Statute 119.0701 with regards to all records for Okaloosa County.

Question 103

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document 14 Grant Funded Clauses, the Department states “This solicitation is fully Federally Grant funded. To the extent applicable, in accordance with Federal law, respondents shall comply with the clauses as enumerated below. Proposer shall adhere to all grant conditions as set forth in the requirements of Grant #23PLN65.” Can the Department confirm this is not a Federally Grant Funded Contract if all services are provided at no cost to the Department?

Response: No, grant funds are being uses, however the response document must be completed in the event federal funds are used in the future.

Question 104

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document 14 Grant Funded Clauses, Utilization of Minority and Women Firms (M/WBE), the Department states “All federally grant funded Contracts or Contracts which may use federal grant funds. Requirement: The proposer must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority business, women’s enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible, in accordance with 2CFR 200.321. If subcontracts are to be let, prime proposer will require compliance by all sub-contractors. Prior to contract award, the proposer shall document efforts to utilize M/WBE firms including what firms were solicited as suppliers and/or subcontractors as applicable and submit this information with their bid submittal.” In reference to the Draft Contract, requirement 13. Subcontracting states “The Contractor is encouraged to seek minority and women business enterprises for participation in subcontracting opportunities.” Question 1: Can the Department clarify if this is applicable if services are provided at no cost to the Department? If the response to Question 1 is yes: Question 2: Is there a percentage or dollar amount for M/WBE firm usage for this solicitation? Question 3: Is there a form that is required to be returned for best efforts? Question 4: How will utilization be scored and evaluated?

Response: There is no goal or dollar amount for this RFP, therefore no form is required and it will not be scored and evaluated.

Question 105

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document #14 Grant Funded Clauses, Buy America: Question 1: Would the Department please confirm that this requirement would not be applicable to this solicitation? Question 2: Please also confirm a “Buy America Certificate” is not required with vendor responses?

Response: It is not applicable and no form is required.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Type of Addition: Addendum 1

Overview: I. Questions / Answers 

II. Attached Layout of Okaloosa County Jail.
III. Attached Call Commission Reports for April 2023 – March 2024.

Deadline: 5/29/2024 3:00 PM

Solicitation #: RFP COR 53-24

Documents:

Posted: 5/22/2024

Type of Addition: Addendum 2

Overview: ADDENDUM 2
May 22, 2024
RFP COR 53-24
Inmate Telecommunication Services for Okaloosa County Department of Corrections
Please find the attached document and information below, for the above referenced Addendum 1. This Addendum is hereby made a part of the Contract Documents and Specifications of the above referenced project. All other requirements of the original Contract Documents and Specifications shall remain effective in their respective order.
The purpose of Addendum 1 is to address vendor questions submitted prior to the last day for questions date.
Questions / Answers

The bid opening date has been revised to June 6, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. (CST).

Deadline: 6/6/2024 3:00 PM

Solicitation #: RFP COR 53-24

Documents:

Posted: 7/15/2024

Type of Addition: Intent to Award (ITA) 7/12/24

Overview: MAG is $750,000.00

Amount: $750,000.00

Documents:

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Is there an online/virtual option for the Mandatory Prebidders Conference?

Response: No. A member of your business must physical attend the Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Do the Insurance Requirements need to be presented with the Proposal or at the time of the Award?

Response: The Insurance Requirements must be provided after the Intent to Award (ITA) is issued.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: We plan on sending a representative to attend the mandatory pre-bid meeting. When the "Sign-up for Pre-Bid Meeting" icon is selected, it automatically populates with the name of the company representative associated with the Vendor Registry profile. However, we would like to send a representative other than the one that is associated with the Vendor Registry profile. Is it acceptable to sign-up for the pre-bid meeting and send a different company representative than the one that the system's automatically defaults to?

Response: Yes. There will be a sign-in sheet at the Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting and will be the only documentation to reflect who attended the meeting.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide the average daily population for the last three months, broken down by month, if possible?

Response: May – 695, June – 685, July – 658, August – 658, September – 673, October – 687, November – 696, December – 679, January – 674, February – 707, March – 710, April – 704

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide a copy of each agreement/contract and all amendments (if applicable) the County has executed with its incumbent inmate Telephone System (ITS), Video Visitation System (VVS) and Tablet provider(s)?

Response: The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: RFP "Attachment B - Insurance Requirements," states: "A performance bond will be required in the amount of $100,000.00 of the estimated contract value. The performance bonds must be submitted with the signed agreement." If a vendor is proposing a solution in which all technologies and services will furnished, installed, maintained and support at no cost to the County, is the vendor still required to submit a performance bond?

Response: Yes

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please provide a breakdown by housing unit of the inmate capacity in each. The inmate capacity for each cell block is necessary for determining network requirements and charging stations needed to support the tablets.

Response: Alpha POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section Bravo POD – Up to 35 in each section A Section B Section C Section Charlie POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Delta POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Echo POD – Up to 50 in each section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section Upstairs – Up to 25 in each section (A, B, C, D) Observation cell 1 - 2 Observation cell 2 - 2 Observation cell 3 - 2 A Section B Section C Section D Section Downstairs – Up to 4 in each cell. Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 Cell 7 Cell 8 Cell 9 Cell 10 Cell 11 Cell 12

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide a copies of Call Detail/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of all ITS calls, minutes, commission rates and revenues?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide copies of Call Detail/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of all VVS calls, minutes, commission rates and revenues?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide copies of Tablet/Kiosk Revenue/Commission Summary Reports for the past three months which shows a breakdown of tablet/kiosk service usage, service cost, revenue and commissions received from inmate electronic messaging (aka email), entertainment, tablets, video messaging, etc?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please provide monthly revenue/commission reports regarding inmate tablet device rentals for the past three months?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please detail all costs/fees associated with inmate tablet device rentals?

Response: In current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Does the County receive commissions on revenue generated by interstate calls today?

Response: Yes

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm that vendors are required to pay the same commission amount for all ITS call payment options (premium, prepaid, debit and collect) and call types (local, interstate, intrastate, international, etc.)?

Response: Yes (see current contract) The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: What limits does the County place, if any, on use of the services in this RFP such as maximum number of onsite visits allowed per week (or other interval), remote visits per week, calls per week, minutes per call/visit, etc?

Response: Inmates must be permitted the availability of two (2) hrs / wk visitation This it a combination of remote/onsite visits, paid and free. Currently they are Twenty (20) minutes/per visit. Phone calls to not have a minimum/maximum amount per week and can be as long as Thirty (30) min/per call.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many inmate tablet devices are currently available for inmate rental at the facility?

Response: Must be enough for each inmate to have one. Currently ADP runs 700-750.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many inmate tablet device charging stations/carts currently installed at the facility?

Response: Fifty (50)

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: How many officer tablet devices are currently available in the facility?

Response: Eight (8)

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Please outline the fees that are being charged to end-users: a). Bill Statement Fee, b). PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Web, c). PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Live Operator and d). Fees for Instant Pay Calls (if applicable)

Response: See current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Is the inmate banking/trust account managed through the commissary system or the Jail Management System (JMS) or other system? If other, please specify.

Response: Commissary

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Who is the County's current inmate banking/trust fund services provider?

Response: Oasis (Lockdown)

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: Who is the County's current Jail Management System (JMS) provider?

Response: XJail

Posted: 5/1/2024

Question: After the first round of questions is answered, will the County accept additional questions if clarification is needed for any of the County’s responses?

Response: Yes - 1 week

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Will the County please provide current commission rates and historical revenue for the past 12 months for each of the following: a. Phone Calls b. Video Visitation c. Messages i. Text ii. Email iii. Other d. Entertainment e. Tablet Rental, if applicable

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Did the County receive a signing bonus or any type of other payments/incentives in association with the current contract? If so, please describe the amount and purpose.

Response: No

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: We have reviewed the current contract information on the County website, and it is unclear if the Minimum Annual Guarantee of $700,000 still applies or if it has been removed or adjusted to a different amount? Please confirm if A) a Minimum Annual Guarantee applies, B) What is the amount of the MAG for the current year, and C) Was the MAG for the most recent complete year met by the commissions paid?

Response: Yes, still applies. Has been met with commissions paid.

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Do detainees currently have the ability to place telephone calls using their tablets?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: Does the current vendor provide full-time employees in similar roles required in the RFP?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/7/2024

Question: When registering on Vendor Registry, only one name was allowed and Mr. Bill Pope is the President / Owner. How do we add the name of the person attending the pre-bid, Mr. Mitch Folsom?

Response: You will need to reach out to Vendor Registry. However, the name on Vendor Registry does not have match the name on who will attend. We will have a sign-in sheet at the Pre-Bid Meeting.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide several recent commission reports for the Jail, showing calls, minutes and revenue (or at minimum paid minutes).

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide average monthly revenue data for any additional services offered under the current contract, such as voicemail, messaging, etc.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the current vendor offer any alternate calling types, such as Advance Pay, PayNow or Text-to-Connect? If so, what are the rates and fees charged for these calls?

Response: Yes. Outlined in current contract - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please outline the fees that are being charged to end-users: a. Bill Statement Fee b. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Web c. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via IVR d. PrePaid Account Funding Fee via Live Operator e. Fees for Instant Pay Calls

Response: Product and services fees/rates are outlined in the current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the commission percentage currently received on inmate telephone revenue.

Response: See Addendum 1. Commission reports attached, percentages outlined in current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the total average monthly commissions received for all services received over the past year from the current vendor.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the County receive commissions on revenue generated by interstate calls today?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the County require that proposals include commissions on interstate calls?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Do commissions from this contract go to the Inmate Welfare Fund, the Sheriff’s Office discretionary fund, or the County general fund?

Response: Inmate Welfare Fund

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Will the County allow for a proposal to present multiple pricing options for the County’s consideration?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide a breakdown of the inmate population, in percentages or actual numbers, by local, DOC, or other agency.

Response: We only have one location and are not State DOC.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the average daily population for the last 12 months, broken down by month, if possible?

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What is the bed count of the facility?

Response: Rated for 594. ADP is 700-750

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Is the inmate trust account managed through the commissary system or the Jail Management System or other system? If other, please specify.

Response: Commissary.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Commissary Integration – Please provide the name and contact information for the current commissary vendor.

Response: Oasis – Greg Webb – gwebb@oasiscommissar.com

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Jail Management Integration – Please provide the name and contact information for the current JMS vendor.

Response: XJail - will be changing

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: In order to ensure a level playing field for all bidders, please confirm that the successful vendor must provide new equipment. Also, please verify that this applies to both new potential bidders and the incumbent provider.

Response: Yes, there will be new equipment required. If the incumbent provider is successful at procuring the bid, then they must ensure our current equipment is the latest available equipment their company offers.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the schedule in which the inmates have access to the inmate phones.

Response: 07:05 – 12:25 13:15 – 17:25 19:10 – 21:55

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: How is commissary ordered today?

Response: Via phone.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Does the current vendor provide debit calling? If so, how are debit accounts funded – e.g., through an inmate’s trust account, lobby kiosk, phone / website payments, etc.? Please list all available methods.

Response: Yes. Current provider has a debit account that can be funded via direct deposits from friends and family through their website or the inmate has the option to transfer funds from their commissary account to their debit account. Upon release/transfer, the remaining funds are transferred to the commissary account and released with the inmate.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Are calling cards being used today? If so, how are they purchased and given to the inmate? What denominations are available?

Response: No.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What limits does the County place, if any, on use of the services in this RFP –maximum number of onsite visits allowed per week (or other interval), remote visits per week, calls per week, minutes per call/visit, etc?

Response: Maximum amount of visitation per week is two (2) hours. This can be a combination of onsite/remote visitations free and at cost. The max amount of visitation per day allowed, of any combination of type of visit, is 1 hour or 3 – 20-minute visitations. (attorney visitations do not calculate in this) There is no limit to the quantity of phone calls permitted per day/week. Max time on a phone call is 30 minutes.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Do you currently have an inmate tablets program? If so: a. How many tablets does the County have today? b. Who is the tablet manufacturer? c. Do inmates share the tablets? How do they check them out? d. Exactly what services and applications are offered on the tablets? e. Are the tablets interfaced with the JMS and for what purpose?

Response: a. enough for ADP (700-750) b. Unknown c. no. they each have their own assigned tablet d. ebooks, radio, games, movies, forms, music, educational, facility notices, law library, text connect, emessages, photos, e. the tablets are not individually interfaced with the JMS. The inmate communications system is. This triggers the account to be opened/closed in the communications system when the inmate is booked/released, assigns the inmate PIN number used to access the call system, and triggers remaining debit funds to be transferred to commissary upon release from the facility.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Digital USPS inmate mail delivery is a required service in the RFP. Does the County prefer to have a scanner so that facility staff can scan mail onsite, or do you prefer to have mail directed to an offsite mail processing center operated by the vendor?

Response: On-site.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: What is the average number of inmate mail pieces received daily? Of these, what percentage are legal mail?

Response: 50-100 public mail. Legal mail will continue to be delivered to the inmate and not be scanned into the system.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Sections 3.68.1 and 4.3.21 require law library access on the kiosks and tablets. Do you have a subscription to a law library service today, or is the vendor expected to provide the law library subscription?

Response: Vendor will provide.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Please provide the historical or estimated/projected call volumes that will be used in the evaluation of calling rates.

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Some vendors provide alternate payment options, such as the ability to purchase a one-time phone call using a credit or debit card, without the necessity of setting up a prepaid account, and typically pay little to no commission on these calls. Will the County please confirm that vendors are required to pay the same commission amount for all calls, including premium, prepaid, debit and collect?

Response: We are open to proposals in regards to this.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: After the first round of questions is answered, will the County accept additional questions if clarification is needed for any of the County’s responses?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: Section 4.3.3 of the RFP requires officer tablets. How many officer tablets are required?

Response: 8-10

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: The current equipment counts in section 2.4 and the required equipment counts in section 3.57.2 are different. In fact, there are significantly fewer phones required than are currently in place according to these numbers. Please clarify, which section shows accurate required equipment quantities?

Response: The amounts in 2.4 are the current wall phones that are only for phone calls. In 3.57.2 we are requesting to have most of those units upgraded to kiosks which, in addition to phone calls, allow other types of activities such as video visitation, emessage, law library, grievance portal, etc.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: In order to provide our best possible offer, it is very important to have historical usage data for all revenue streams. This data is necessary to estimate costs as well as potential revenues. The current vendor has access to this information, so distributing the information to other vendors in a timely fashion will ensure a level playing field for all bidders. Please provide as much data as possible from the following: Call Revenue – # of calls per month, # of minutes per month, total revenue per month for each: • LOCAL – Collect • INTRALATA – Collect • INTERLATA – Collect • INTERSTATE – Collect • LOCAL – Debit • INTRALATA – Debit • INTERLATA – Debit • INTERSTATE – Debit • International – Debit • LOCAL – Prepaid Collect • INTRALATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERLATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERSTATE – Prepaid Collect Tablet Revenue - # transactions per month, cost basis (per minute / message / month / song purchase, etc.) and total revenue per month for each: • Tablet Lease • Electronic Messaging • Video Messaging • Entertainment Content Video Visitation Revenue • # Visits Per Month • # of Minutes per Month (if minute based) • Total Revenue Per Month

Response: See Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/9/2024

Question: To evaluate usage data and additional revenue potential, it is very helpful to have the rates currently being charged to end-users under the current contract. Please provide the following: Call Category – Rate for First Minute and for Each Additional Minute for each: • LOCAL – Collect • INTRALATA – Collect • INTERLATA – Collect • INTERSTATE – Collect • LOCAL – Debit • INTRALATA – Debit • INTERLATA – Debit • INTERSTATE – Debit • International – Debit • LOCAL – Prepaid Collect • INTRALATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERLATA – Prepaid Collect • INTERSTATE – Prepaid Collect Tablet Rates – Rate Charged and Cost Basis (flat rate or per-minute fee) for each: • Tablet Rental Fee • Movie Rental • TV Show Rental • Music • Games • Video Rentals • Video Purchases Video Visitation Rates • Per-Visit or Per-Minute Rate • Cost Basis (per visit or per-minute Messaging Rates – Rate Charged and Cost Basis (per message or per minute) for each: • Voicemail • Email/Text Message • Video Message

Response: In current contract. - The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q1 Re: No. 8 Contract for Services. To acknowledge exceptions to the Terms and Agreements of the standard agreement, would Okaloosa County prefer we list exceptions under this paragraph, or should we include a “redlined” copy of the Sample Agreement as an Attachment?

Response: No preference.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q2 Re: Integrity of Proposal Documents. Could the County please define what is meant by “only in the spaces where a response is requested”? For example, in the Response Documents # 1-15, there are underlined blank spaces where we are to provide the response. However, throughout most of the documents, There are no underlined blank spaces. Most requirements have a single line between them and the following response. Can we add spaces there in order to provide the response? As an example of that, Requirement 3.62.15, we are instructed that we must ensure and state that all maintenance calls from the Department shall be answered by a “live” operator/service representative at all times. Can we insert the response and explanation there, or does the County want us to create an addendum for each of those answers? Because the RFP states: “Any modifications or alterations to the original proposal documents by the respondent, whether intentional or otherwise, will constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal. Any such modifications or alterations that a respondent wishes to propose must be clearly stated in the respondent’s response in the form of an addendum to the original proposal documents.” Because there is a risk of disqualification, please provide clarification on how we are to structure our response.

Response: You can provide your answers under each section.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q3 Re: Attachment “A”. Vendor’s Proposal We are not sure what to put in this attachment. Our entire response will be the “Vendor’s Proposal”. Should we consider that the desired content here is a summary of our solution and offer? Please clarify what should go here.

Response: It is part of the draft contract and we will insert the winning proposer’s response during the contract preparation.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q4 Re Cover/Transmittal Letter and Executive Summary. We generally provide a Cover/Transmittal Letter and Executive Summary near the beginning of a proposal response. Should we add a Cover Letter and/or Executive Summary after the Acknowledgement Form, or would that be considered a modification or alteration to the original proposal documents?

Response: A cover letter is not considered a modification.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q5 Re: Table of Contents We normally provide a Table of Contents at the beginning of the response. Do we correctly assume this would not be considered a modification or alteration of the original proposal documents, and thus we can we add that to the response, or should we not include a Table of Contents?

Response: A table of contents is not considered a modification.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q6 Preparation of Proposal – words and numbers. Pricing, rates, fees, etc, are normally included in tables to enhance clarity of the offering. Does the County require these amounts be in both words and numbers? Within a table, for example, should we show the price as: $0.55 per minute AND Fifty-Five cents per minute? Outside of pricing tables, if we are referencing, for example, number of employees or years of service, does the County require that those figures be presented in both works and numbers?

Response: Numbers only are acceptable.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q7 Re: Proposal Price for each section, Item, alternative, adjustment, unit price item listed therein, or the words “No Proposal”, “No Change”, or “Not Applicable” entered. We normally provide a consolidated Financial offer with details included there. Does the County require pricing to be distributed throughout the RFP, rather than in a consolidated financial offer? Could the County identify What they mean by a section or item? Given this instruction, we are not sure where the County needs pricing. We don’t see blank, underlined forms or spaces where we can provide that information. Under 9. Cost Proposal, we assume all pricing would be located in this section. Given the instruction above, we are concerned that may not be correct. Given the instruction provided, we want to be sure we are responding per requirements: “All blanks in the proposal documents shall be completed electronically in both words and numbers with the amounts extended, totaled and the proposal signed. A proposal price shall be indicated for each section, proposal item, alternative, adjustment unit price item, and unit price item listed therein, or the words “No Proposal”, “No Change”, or “Not Applicable” entered. No changes shall be made to the phraseology of the form or in the items mentioned therein. In case of any discrepancy between the written amount and the numeric figures, the written amount shall govern. Any proposal which contains any omissions, erasures, alterations, additions, irregularities of any kind, or items not called for which shall in any manner fail to conform to the conditions of public notice inviting proposals may be rejected.”

Response: You may submit one cost proposal for all items requested in Section 4.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q8 Under the Addendum section, we are told that written addenda or modification shall be part of the RFP and that it will be issued five (5) days prior to the date and time of closing. The questions are being answered online at the Bid site. Are these considered binding as part of the RFP, and how would you like us to acknowledge them? (Response Document #6 provides space for an Addendum Number and date.)

Response: We will post an addendum after the question/answer period that will have all questions asked form vendors. The vendors are required to review and acknowledge that they received the addendums.

Posted: 5/13/2024

Question: Q9 Comply Statements We generally insert a Comply statement after each requirement to show we have Read, Understood, and Will Comply with the requirement. If we add that to each requirement, would that be considered a modification or alteration to the original proposal documents or can we include that statement? These show acceptance of each requirement and provide an easy -to-read separation between the requirement and any written responses provided.

Response: It would not be concerned a modification/alteration.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: As a supplement to the question posed here, we would also provide a copy of our Master Services Agreement as an attachment, if the County would prefer that approach. Question Type: My Question Question submit date: 5/13/2024 7:26:27 AM Question: Q1 Re: No. 8 Contract for Services. To acknowledge exceptions to the Terms and Agreements of the standard agreement, would Okaloosa County prefer we list exceptions under this paragraph, or should we include a “redlined” copy of the Sample Agreement as an Attachment?

Response: We will be using our County approved agreement which is attached to the RFP.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm who the Trust Accounting Vendor is?

Response: If you are referring to the inmate commissary account, that is through Oasis (Lockdown).

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.59, states system acceptance is 30 consecutive days post completion and testing with problem free within 60 days of the installation date, Will the County please confirm if all services are to be installed within 90 business days?

Response: Yes.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.3, 3.3.1 states two full time technicians must be included with the solution offered to the County. Would the County please clarify what the specific tasks are for each of the technicians? For example, one technician for administration and repair of tablets and the other technician is working on administration and repair of video visitation and inmate telephone system. Please clarify each of the jobs?

Response: We would like for both to be fully trained and able to address any maintenance issues as well as do the administrative side of monitoring visits, calls, assigning tablets, assisting the public when needed, ets. This gives the county assurance that when one tech is on PTO, the one remaining is able to fulfill all needed duties.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Section 3.3.1 Does the current vendor provide two technicians for the County today?

Response: Currently we are provided 1.5 onsite technicians.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm the current ADP?

Response: Current ADP is 713.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Count please confirm if construction services are included with the requirements of this RFP or is this a typo? Will the County please confirm what is meant by construction services?

Response: We will remove that, it was a typo on our end. See updated notice to respondents attached in Addendum 2.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify 8. Understanding of the Project, requirement 8.1 which asks for a line-by-line response to Section V. Scope of Work. This appears to be in conflict of the line-by-line Scope of Work responses required for 3. Scope of Work & Services to be Provided through the end of 4.4 Video Relay Services. Also there does not appear to be a Section V in the RFP. Can the County clarify what is to be provided in response to 8.1?

Response: It looks as if the identifier was changed from roman numerals to numbers. It is meant to read “response to Section 3.” It is requested to have a response from the vendor for the approach, technique and procedures to accomplice each line item in Section 3.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify if the entire response needs to be returned, such as informational sections such as the letter on page 2 of the RFP document, 1. Introduction, 2. Background, 10 Appendix, 11. Evaluation Criteria and 12. Procurement Schedule?

Response: The response should include all necessary information to complete your proposal, all required forms, cost/ fee proposals and all answers to questions within the document. The vendor does not need to include the RFP information, background, appendix, and evaluation criteria and procurement schedule.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Can the County clarify if responses to the General Conditions are required?

Response: A response would only be needed if you are taking exception to one of the conditions.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the County confirm the following outline and table of contents will be acceptable for responses? If not, can the County provide an outline? | Cover Letter | Executive Summary | Understanding of the Project | Scope of Work | Cost Proposal | Statement of Qualification | References | Personnel | Addenda | Attachments | Value-Added Options

Response: Yes that will be acceptable.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.4; Requirement states, All system hardware, software, software level and support systems must be compatible with Department inmate software applications and applicable hardware. Question: Will the Department please clarify what hardware and software specifically the Department intends to interface our systems with at the Department. Also, what is the use case for the interface?

Response: The current interfaces are with the JMS to load inmate profiles into the communication system and then with the inmate commissary account as well to allow for transfer to and from the inmate communications debit account.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.67.13; The ITS must average at least a monthly automation rate of seventy-five percent (75%). Eighty percent (80%) is preferred. Will the Department please clarify what is meant by monthly automation rate and how this apply to the inmate telephone system?

Response: This is in regards to the software and interfaces running with very little employee need to manage. In other words, the department doesn’t want a software that has the need of constant input, adjustment, management from employees. We are requesting an automated system that can essentially function independently.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 3.68.5; Video visitation terminals must have setup availability at an offsite location and be staffed with vendor personnel, if needed, to assist visitors during hours of operation. • Is the Department planning on deploying VVS hardware/system in an offsite visitor center during this contract or is this speaking to a remote visit with Friends & Family with vendor support? • Does the Department currently have a remote VVS visitor center today? • If the Department currently has a remote VVS visitor center, where is it located? How many terminals are there? How many vendor staff support this remote center today? • Does the Department currently conduct video visits at the facility?

Response: 1. We are looking into options for an off site visitation area. Nothing has been confirmed at this time. We wanted it written into the contract because we anticipate it to happen this year. Yes, if needed support then one of the onsite techs would be required to work that visitation area during times of operation. 2. We currently have a public visitation area but it is onsite at the main facility. The goal is to remove unessential personnel from being on the secured grounds. 3. We do not currently have an off-site visitation area. Our current public visitation area has 17 terminals. We currently have a vendor employee that works .5 FTE during visitation hours to assist visitors with getting set up on their terminals, verifying their ID and recording any additional visitors to the visit. We also have a full time vendor employee that assists when needed in that area. 4. Yes, in our public visitation area.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 5.1.3; Certification from the Vendor that they have the ability to commence full operations within forty-five (45) days after notification of award. Will the Department please clarify if this time frame for implementation is in terms of 45 business days? Will the Department please revise to allow for a minimum of ninety (90) days to install the materials and services instead of forty-five (45), as forty-five days does not allow bidders sufficient time to properly complete the installation of the materials and services described in the RFP?

Response: Yes, we will allow for 90 calendar days to complete all installation needed.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Item 4.3.12; Vendor tablet system network is to be dual encapsulated with servers being dual authenticated. Will the Department please clarify what is meant by the term "dual encapsulated"? What is the County's specific concern here?

Response: The concern is the ability for our very tech savvy inmates being able to hack the tablets and gain access to the internet. Please present any security measures you have in place to prevent this along with references from facilities that use your tablets.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department confirm where inmate tablets are to be physically distributed, (i.e. housing unit or intake)?

Response: They will be distributed at classification. That can be anywhere from 2-7 days after initial booking into the facility.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm if inmates use tablets in Booking/Intake area?

Response: No, they do not.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm if there are outlets for the charging carts in the housing units?

Response: Within the housing sections electrical outlet have been ran.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12-months of Call Data?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: We respectfully request that the Department extend the bid submission date by two weeks from when the final vendor question responses will be provided. This would allow vendors to have an adequate opportunity to review answers to questions that are currently only known to the incumbent provider. The current schedule accepts questions until 05/20/24, which is only 6 business day(s) prior to when vendors will need to upload their proposals.

Response: The bid opening date has been revised to June 6, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. (CST).

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm the current commission rate?

Response: The current contract can be viewed at https://vrapp.vendorregistry.com/Contract/View/Contract?contractId=bfcc3dc6-9152-4820-9c58-660ab0228b00 on the Vendor Registry (VR) Website

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12 months commission/revenue reports for inmate phones, showing calls, minutes and revenue (or at minimum calls and minutes)? If reports are not available, please provide statistics showing the requested data broken down by call type (collect, prepaid, debit, etc.) and tariff type (local, intralata, interlata, interstate, international)?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please provide the last 12 months commission/revenue reports for video visitation, showing the number of visits and minutes per month? If reports are not available, please provide visitation data broken down by type (onsite, free remote, paid remote, paid attorney)?

Response: Attached in Addendum 1.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will the Department please confirm how will results of the RFP will be provided once evaluations are complete and the intent to award and/or award has been made?

Response: We will email all vendors with the Intent to Award.

Posted: 5/15/2024

Question: Will multiple financial offers be permitted?

Response: The vendor should submit a financial offer based on Section 4 of the RFP. If the vendor wishes to provide additional offers, they should mark it as “optional offers”.

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: In the RFP requirements, the County states that “A state contractor license # for the State of Florida shall also be included on the proposal form. Respondent shall be licensed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 489, Florida Statutes.” Section 489.101 states that the purpose of this statute is to regulate the “Construction Industry”. In Section 489.103, telecommunications companies are exempted from this requirement. Section 364.02 defines what a telecommunications company is. Does the County intend to require vendors as telecommunications companies to be licensed within the Construction industry in this RFP?

Response: No, they do not have a license within the Construction industry, however, they shall be licensed to do business in the state of Florida.

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: Will the County please confirm that the Performance Bond is a fixed amount of $100,000.00 or is there some other amount? The requirement states: “A performance bond will be required in the amount of $100,000.00 of the estimated contract value.” (Attachment B, first item.)

Response: The fixed amount of $100,000.00 is correct.

Posted: 5/16/2024

Question: Given requirements in Response Document No. 14, Can the County confirm that this RFP is supported by Federal Grant Funds?

Response: No, grant funds are being uses, however the response document must be completed in the event federal funds are used in the future.

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: Are vendors allowed to present multiple ITS call service/commission rate options?

Response: Please submit in accordance with the RFP. If you choose to submit other options, please title them as optional rates.

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to General Conditions; Section 21. COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 119.0701. Would the Department please confirm how vendors will be acting on behalf of Okaloosa County so that it is subject to Florida Statute 119.0701?

Response: The vendor shall follow all the items in Florida Statute 119.0701 with regards to all records for Okaloosa County.

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document 14 Grant Funded Clauses, the Department states “This solicitation is fully Federally Grant funded. To the extent applicable, in accordance with Federal law, respondents shall comply with the clauses as enumerated below. Proposer shall adhere to all grant conditions as set forth in the requirements of Grant #23PLN65.” Can the Department confirm this is not a Federally Grant Funded Contract if all services are provided at no cost to the Department?

Response: No, grant funds are being uses, however the response document must be completed in the event federal funds are used in the future.

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document 14 Grant Funded Clauses, Utilization of Minority and Women Firms (M/WBE), the Department states “All federally grant funded Contracts or Contracts which may use federal grant funds. Requirement: The proposer must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority business, women’s enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible, in accordance with 2CFR 200.321. If subcontracts are to be let, prime proposer will require compliance by all sub-contractors. Prior to contract award, the proposer shall document efforts to utilize M/WBE firms including what firms were solicited as suppliers and/or subcontractors as applicable and submit this information with their bid submittal.” In reference to the Draft Contract, requirement 13. Subcontracting states “The Contractor is encouraged to seek minority and women business enterprises for participation in subcontracting opportunities.” Question 1: Can the Department clarify if this is applicable if services are provided at no cost to the Department? If the response to Question 1 is yes: Question 2: Is there a percentage or dollar amount for M/WBE firm usage for this solicitation? Question 3: Is there a form that is required to be returned for best efforts? Question 4: How will utilization be scored and evaluated?

Response: There is no goal or dollar amount for this RFP, therefore no form is required and it will not be scored and evaluated.

Posted: 5/20/2024

Question: In reference to Response Document #14 Grant Funded Clauses, Buy America: Question 1: Would the Department please confirm that this requirement would not be applicable to this solicitation? Question 2: Please also confirm a “Buy America Certificate” is not required with vendor responses?

Response: It is not applicable and no form is required.