Dorchester County Sealed Solicitation
Title: On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services for Transportation Sales Tax Projects
Deadline: 10/9/2023 2:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Status: Awarded
Solicitation Number: 2024-16
Description: Dorchester County is seeking to engage qualified engineering consulting firms, licensed in the State of South Carolina, to provide engineering design services for transportation projects developed under the County’s
Transportation Sales Tax (TST) program. A list of potential projects developed under this solicitation may be viewed on the County’s website at: https://www.dorchestercountysc.gov/our-county/transportation-sales-tax-referendum-2022/proposed-projects.
Documents:
| Documents as of 9/11/2023 |
|---|
| Login to view documents |
PLANHOLDERS:
| Date | Company Name |
|---|---|
| 9/11/2023 10:41:36 AM | STV Incorporated |
| 9/11/2023 10:41:40 AM | TranSystems Corporation |
| 9/11/2023 10:43:32 AM | Lochmueller Group, Inc. |
| 9/11/2023 10:44:59 AM | Creech & Associates |
| 9/11/2023 10:48:17 AM | Liollio Architecture |
| 9/11/2023 10:58:52 AM | Parrish and Partners, LLC |
| 9/11/2023 11:00:38 AM | Toole Design Group, LLC |
| 9/11/2023 11:08:42 AM | GEL Engineering |
| 9/11/2023 11:22:26 AM | HDR |
| 9/11/2023 11:23:15 AM | Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc |
| 9/11/2023 11:34:17 AM | The Bastion Group |
| 9/11/2023 1:32:05 PM | Live Oak Consultants, LLC |
| 9/11/2023 3:08:35 PM | Stantec |
| 9/11/2023 3:29:36 PM | DRMP, Inc. |
| 9/11/2023 4:15:37 PM | Alliance Consulting Engineers, Inc. |
| 9/12/2023 8:15:58 AM | Insight Group, LLC |
| 9/12/2023 9:00:18 AM | CRANSTON LLC |
| 9/12/2023 2:50:32 PM | Terracon Consultants, Inc. |
| 9/12/2023 10:20:34 PM | North America Procurement Council, Inc. PBC |
| 9/13/2023 3:07:58 AM | alisha pvt ltd |
| 9/13/2023 2:41:54 PM | Thomas & Hutton |
| 9/14/2023 12:29:02 AM | School Wholesale Supplies LLC |
| 9/14/2023 7:44:45 AM | AECOM |
| 9/14/2023 8:47:04 AM | McMillan Pazdan Smith Architecture |
| 9/15/2023 5:53:39 AM | Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. |
| 9/15/2023 8:16:25 AM | HDR |
| 9/18/2023 11:24:47 AM | J. Michael Sullivan |
| 9/18/2023 2:18:43 PM | Caplea Coe Architects, Inc. |
| 9/19/2023 10:49:42 AM | Campco Engineering, Inc. |
| 9/19/2023 11:34:09 AM | KCI Technologies |
| 9/20/2023 6:37:30 AM | SevenOutsource |
| 9/25/2023 9:29:07 AM | Dennis Corporation |
| 9/27/2023 9:18:54 AM | McKim & Creed Inc |
| 9/27/2023 1:02:24 PM | Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. |
| 9/29/2023 3:53:39 AM | North America Procurement Council Inc., PBC |
| 9/29/2023 12:00:39 PM | Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. |
| 9/29/2023 3:14:06 PM | HDR, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:37:23 AM | CECS |
| 10/2/2023 10:37:30 AM | HNTB |
| 10/2/2023 10:37:36 AM | Gannett Fleming, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:37:48 AM | Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP |
| 10/2/2023 10:39:39 AM | TranSytems |
| 10/2/2023 10:39:42 AM | Mead & Hunt, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:41:02 AM | McCormick Taylor, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:43:58 AM | GF |
| 10/2/2023 10:48:07 AM | ESP Associates, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:48:47 AM | CONSOR ENGINEERS, LLC |
| 10/2/2023 10:49:45 AM | Kimley-Horn |
| 10/2/2023 10:50:25 AM | GMK Associates, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:50:45 AM | Holt Consulting Company, LLC |
| 10/2/2023 10:51:31 AM | Michael Baker International, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 10:52:43 AM | Stantec |
| 10/2/2023 11:01:26 AM | Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering, PLLC |
| 10/2/2023 11:13:24 AM | Mattern & Craig |
| 10/2/2023 11:16:59 AM | DP3 Architects, Ltd. |
| 10/2/2023 11:37:49 AM | The Traffic Group |
| 10/2/2023 11:55:32 AM | ESP |
| 10/2/2023 12:14:49 PM | SUMMIT - Engineering, Laboratory and Testing |
| 10/2/2023 12:42:15 PM | Landplan Group South Inc |
| 10/2/2023 12:54:50 PM | Soil Consultants Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 1:12:43 PM | SELECT Power Systems |
| 10/2/2023 1:26:42 PM | ConstructConnect |
| 10/2/2023 2:07:19 PM | Seamon, Whiteside & Associates, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 2:26:15 PM | Soil Consultants, Inc. |
| 10/2/2023 6:52:03 PM | envirobidnet |
| 10/3/2023 2:00:55 AM | AG Ltd |
| 10/3/2023 5:02:24 AM | Dodge Data & Analytics |
| 10/3/2023 6:58:04 AM | IMS |
| 10/4/2023 1:52:29 PM | Cranston LLC |
| 10/4/2023 9:09:10 PM | CDM Smith, Inc |
| 10/5/2023 10:48:16 AM | A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc. |
| 10/6/2023 12:22:24 PM | Stantec |
| 10/7/2023 2:33:16 PM | Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. |
| 10/9/2023 11:51:44 AM | A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc. |
| 12/18/2023 3:32:26 PM | AMT Engineering |
| 12/18/2023 4:15:23 PM | SEPI Engineering & Construction, Inc., A Division of TranSystems |
| 1/2/2024 5:50:18 AM | Deltek |
| 1/10/2024 9:27:13 AM | Arcadis U.S. |
| 1/10/2024 12:39:00 PM | ARCADIS US INC |
| 1/16/2024 9:50:16 AM | F&ME Consultants, Inc. |
| 1/17/2024 1:39:38 PM | CDM Smith |
| 1/22/2024 10:48:57 AM | Davis & Floyd |
| 1/25/2024 3:56:42 PM | Michael Baker International |
| 2/1/2024 10:41:38 AM | STV Incorporated |
| 2/19/2024 8:35:07 AM | J Bragg Consulting |
| 2/19/2024 12:31:02 PM | Parrish and Partners, LLC |
| 2/27/2024 9:16:51 AM | Reveer Group, LLC |
| 2/29/2024 4:26:43 PM | RK&K |
| 3/11/2024 10:33:33 AM | Consor Engineers, LLC |
| 3/31/2024 5:54:41 AM | Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc. |
Addition 1
Posted: 10/2/2023
Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1
Overview: Please see attached addendum, which summarizes questions that have been received. The County has provided answers to these questions.
Documents:
Addition 2
Posted: 10/9/2023
Type of Addition: In Review
Addition 3
Posted: 12/29/2023
Type of Addition: Letters of Intent
Overview: Letters of intent have been sent to the top seven scored companies for large projects.
Documents:
Addition 4
Posted: 12/29/2023
Type of Addition: Letters of Intent for Small Projects
Overview: Letters of intent have been sent to the 8 top-scored firms for small projects.
Documents:
Addition 5
Posted: 1/10/2024
Type of Addition: Weighted Score Tabulation for Large Projects
Overview:
Documents:
Addition 6
Posted: 1/10/2024
Type of Addition: Weighted Score Tabulation for Small Projects
Overview:
Documents:
Addition 7
Posted: 4/1/2024
Type of Addition: Award Information
Overview: Large projects awarded to Stantec, Mead & Hunt, TranSystems, Davis & Floyd, HNTB Corporation, CECS, and Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering. Small projects awarded to Davis & Floyd, Stantec, Mead & Hunt, A. Morton Thomas & Associates, Mattern & Craig, TranSystems, CECS, and Johnson, Mirmiran, and Thompson, Inc.
Amount: $1.00
Question 1
Posted: 9/27/2023
Question: On page 7, specifically item 7, it states that the Right of Way Services Lead should be an employee of a firm on the SCDOT list of Approved Right of Way Acquisition Consultants and demonstrate a history of work on projects like those in the County’s program. The SCDOT has advised that they are not going to renew the list of Approved Right of Way Acquisition Consultants are they are in the process of communicating this with the counties. Seeing as how this list has expired, and will not be renewed, should this be a requirement for the Right of Way Services Lead?
Response: An addendum will be issued to change #7 on Page 7 to read: 7. Right of Way Services Lead The Right of Way Services Lead should demonstrate their knowledge and ability to provide right of way acquisition services per the Scope of Work and a history of work on projects like those in the County’s program.
Question 2
Posted: 9/27/2023
Question: o Do firms not physically located in Dorchester County need a Dorchester business license or would the license from the county the firm’s office is located in sufficient? o If a firm is not located within the County limits does the Division 10 Dorchester County Vendor Preference still need to be signed and returned? o Please confirm which forms are required from subconsultants.
Response: Any firms conducting business within the County will need a County business license. If they are performing all services within their jurisdiction, then their County or municipality license will be sufficient. If the vendor preference form does not apply to your firm, that form does not to be submitted. While subconsultants must meet all requirements found in the solicitation, they do not need to complete the required forms needed from the prime consultant.
Question 3
Posted: 9/28/2023
Question: Does the proposal need to be Double Spaced?
Response: No, The RFQ does not require double-spaced proposals.
Posted: 10/2/2023
Type of Addition: Addendum No. 1
Overview: Please see attached addendum, which summarizes questions that have been received. The County has provided answers to these questions.
Documents:
Posted: 10/9/2023
Type of Addition: In Review
Posted: 12/29/2023
Type of Addition: Letters of Intent
Overview: Letters of intent have been sent to the top seven scored companies for large projects.
Documents:
Posted: 12/29/2023
Type of Addition: Letters of Intent for Small Projects
Overview: Letters of intent have been sent to the 8 top-scored firms for small projects.
Documents:
Posted: 1/10/2024
Type of Addition: Weighted Score Tabulation for Large Projects
Overview:
Documents:
Posted: 1/10/2024
Type of Addition: Weighted Score Tabulation for Small Projects
Overview:
Documents:
Posted: 4/1/2024
Type of Addition: Award Information
Overview: Large projects awarded to Stantec, Mead & Hunt, TranSystems, Davis & Floyd, HNTB Corporation, CECS, and Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering. Small projects awarded to Davis & Floyd, Stantec, Mead & Hunt, A. Morton Thomas & Associates, Mattern & Craig, TranSystems, CECS, and Johnson, Mirmiran, and Thompson, Inc.
Amount: $1.00
Posted: 9/27/2023
Question: On page 7, specifically item 7, it states that the Right of Way Services Lead should be an employee of a firm on the SCDOT list of Approved Right of Way Acquisition Consultants and demonstrate a history of work on projects like those in the County’s program. The SCDOT has advised that they are not going to renew the list of Approved Right of Way Acquisition Consultants are they are in the process of communicating this with the counties. Seeing as how this list has expired, and will not be renewed, should this be a requirement for the Right of Way Services Lead?
Response: An addendum will be issued to change #7 on Page 7 to read: 7. Right of Way Services Lead The Right of Way Services Lead should demonstrate their knowledge and ability to provide right of way acquisition services per the Scope of Work and a history of work on projects like those in the County’s program.
Posted: 9/27/2023
Question: o Do firms not physically located in Dorchester County need a Dorchester business license or would the license from the county the firm’s office is located in sufficient? o If a firm is not located within the County limits does the Division 10 Dorchester County Vendor Preference still need to be signed and returned? o Please confirm which forms are required from subconsultants.
Response: Any firms conducting business within the County will need a County business license. If they are performing all services within their jurisdiction, then their County or municipality license will be sufficient. If the vendor preference form does not apply to your firm, that form does not to be submitted. While subconsultants must meet all requirements found in the solicitation, they do not need to complete the required forms needed from the prime consultant.
Posted: 9/28/2023
Question: Does the proposal need to be Double Spaced?
Response: No, The RFQ does not require double-spaced proposals.